Printable View
I was the lend's back up once but mostly worked behind the scene changing the stage display turning "breaks" at my HS drama. (I think its called backup. its when you have to do her role if shes unable to make it such as being sick)Quote:
Originally Posted by MarieDelta
The person below me had a most hated bully in school and has no reason why that person was such a bully since you didn't do anything to them.
False..me made sure she had gud reason 2 try an bully me... note...try... tee hee:tong:
The person below me is a cheeky cow/sod..
True - you know that's me
The person below me could hit a cow's backside with a banjo
Ne 1 hit my arse wiv a banjo me give em summat they didn bargain for!!!:bigrin:
The person below me thinks me a smart arse!!!:tong:
False - you're a donkey's ass
The person below has left their ass "Maggie" behind in my trousers
False, but interesting to know that yours would fit her... :)
The person below me loves to make love under the full , fall moon.
ooo def Kit...
the person below me has knobbly knees
True, to some extent- but doesn't everyone?
The person below me is *totally* (100%) secure about their physique.
false could lose a few pounds and some excess hair.
the person below hates something about their body
True - theres a few things about my body that i dont like and would change.
The person below me loves PVC and leather.
True - nice,
The person below me would like to see Becky in her PVC/leather
T-r-u-e! I'm always keen to see ANYONE in their leather/PVC. Except perhaps Dafydd (as in "The Only Gay In The Village", rather than "our" Dave).Quote:
Originally Posted by Sarasvati
The person below believes that unless they mentioned it, no-one would ever realise that they were Bisexual just by looking at them.
verry true. i'd probably be considered asexual before bisexual.
the person below me has lied about their age.
False - I've always been 476 years old.
The person below me is the halitosis kid
False, although catch me after I've drunk half a pot of coffee and before I've brushed my teeth on a Sunday morning, and you're probably half-way there.
The person below me likes to consciously act in a manner that is generally considered un-typical for their gender from time to time.
very true
the person below me bought a new sex toy this weekend
kit
false. i've never tried a sex toy and i'm not sure how to go about initiating my first inanimate encounter.
the person below me has been so nervous about getting to know someone better that they have chickened out completely.
True. but I have gained a lot more confidence since joining this site.
The person below me believes that weddings are NOT good pick up places....
(arghhh this guy last night at this wedding we went to...)
true. too much talk of marriage and kids combined with free-flowing alcohol makes for desperate encounters.
the person below me is self-conscious about their body image and is doing something about it.
Of course isnt everyone?! i crash diet that is my way!
The person below me secretly really cares about the way someone who they are attracted to looks E.G. - body type, size, skin colour, hair colour etc, even though they often pretend they are not.
all the time! first impressions last, whether they be insight into their personality on a forum or a person's looks as u check them out on the street.
the person below me DOESN'T believe in long distance relationships.
Do I believe in them? Are they a bit like "Shadow People"? Yes, I believe in them. but I think they are impractical unless you have extremely good communication channels. I'm sure they work for some people, though. Its just depends on whether you're the sort of person that can deal with not physically seeing your partner on a daily basis.Quote:
Originally Posted by naive
the person below me thinks that internet dating is more trouble than its worth.
false. for some people, if all other avenues have been explored, dating sites provide a valuable alternative. i wouldn't rule out this option for my future endeavours.
the person below me likes having the last word.
Sometimes, well mot of the time, but sometimes its necessary to let someone else have the last word.
The person below me can speak more than one language.
False - only know 1 and have problems with that one at times! ;)
THe person below me if bald would buy a wig or hairpiece
NOT JUST FALSE BUT HELL NO FALSE
I WISH THEY WOULD INVENT A PILL TO MAKE IT ALL FALL OUT INSTEAD OF GROWING MORE
THE PERSON BELOW ME LIKES CHROME HEADED MEN
Erm... "chrome headed"? You mean bald and shiny? Its not really my sorta thing. But I guess I wouldn't rule it out if the right guy came along.
The person below me knows what "Transactional Analysis" is.
Can't say I do, sorry.
The person below thinks Hillary Clinton is scary :eek:
Bit 2 rite wing for me hun.. but scary?? u mus b kiddin...
The person below me thinks bushie is a dangerous fool.
True, but then most politicians are. Unless they're Pacifists. And even Pacifism can probably be dangerous under the right circumstances.Quote:
Originally Posted by darkeyes
The person below me whole-heartedly believes that the War in Iraq was justified...
Don b daft Skater..ya shud kno betta than 2 ask stupid questions...:tong:
the person below me neva asks stupid questions...:bigrin:
Me a pacifist hun... will argue that point wiv ya if ya like sumwer else....;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Skater Boy
Fran, you'd be surprised how many peeps still think the war was totally justified. Especially Americans!Quote:
Originally Posted by darkeyes
Not to put words in her mouth, but didn't JoyJoyHollywood have some pretty strong and controversial views on this subject?
As for Pacifism, I think ANY political movement, if adhered to in an EXCESSIVELY rigid fashion, can be dangerous. No offense! But agreed, Pacifism is usually preferable to its opposite.
Together we CAN derail this thread :bigrin:
Oh, and I put the FIST in the word pacifist :P
I like it! A catchy slogan! Its kinda paradoxical too...Quote:
Originally Posted by Azrael
Just outta curiosity, Fran, I'd be interested to know what your veiws on World War 2 are. There combined lie two things that you feel passionately about... one being extreme racism and homophobia, and the other being war. In this case, one was used to fight the other. But I was just wondering about a self-confessed Pacifist's perspective on it... "If Fran Were President" (so to speak), would we have fought that war against Hitler and the Nazis?
A sincere question, and respectfully asked.
SB
the person below me like to j/o in public
No i do not lol :OQuote:
Originally Posted by island3242000
The person below me gets turned on all the time for no apparent reason!
Pacifism in itself is not a dangerous philosophy Skater... wot is dangerous is how the enemies of pacifism, who r many react 2 an abuse it. Like ne otha philosophy at this time it is flawed cos humanity itself is flawed. It don make it rong.. an it don make it dangerous. Wud ratha b a pacifst than a bloody squaddie ne day wiva gun in me hand.Quote:
Originally Posted by Skater Boy
Have much 2 much respect for human life to even dream of pickin up a weapon to kill sum 1 eitha in self defence or in an aggressive moment.. if that means me number is up..an the worst happens 2 me then so b it... me refuses 2 lower meself 2 the base instinct of the worst of our kind. It is leadin by example in me small way.. one of many, cos ther lots of us about who feel the same way. Violence solves nowt..the state of teh world 2day is as a result of historical conflicts wich have never reely been resolved... 2 ansa in part ya post lata on..world war 2 was fought cos world the wrld war 1 peace wos fukked up... the reparations forced on Germany by France an GB in the main cud neva b repaid, an the collapse of the German economy wos inevitable...wiv the eventual rise of the Nazis an the sad case that ww2 wos considered necessary.. me don think it wos inevitable...jus as me don think the rise of the nazi's wos inevitable.. its a complex issue wich has no easy ansa...
As a socialist..an a pacifist, an mainly interested in social issues, an betterin our world, not destroyin it, the second world war is merely an incendental result of social discord, created by selfish bastards like Lloyd George an Clemenceau as leaders of ther countries.. Woodrow Wilson knew wot wud happen an ultimately he wos proved riite..
Pacifism had its gr8est crises in 1936 wiv the Spanish Civil war an from 1939 wiv ww2... don deny it wos found wantin.. an that many pacifists hadnt a clue wot 2 do... dunno wot me ansa is 2 ya question bout ww2 2 b honest... scratched me head any times ova it.. jus know that fightin ww2 didn reely solve owt..it lead 2 the cold war.. it led 2 the creation of Israel wich eventually led led 2 the rise of the present wars in Iraq an Afrghanistan... an the al qaeda shite bags... an that will lead onta 2 anotha conflict sumday..an so on...
Ther no easy ansa.. all me sayin is that every war has consequences..like everyd ecision we make in life.. jus wars are a bit more serious mattas.. an they r neva resolved totally satisfactorally.. an they neva will b... apart from the little matta that me cares bout human beins.. an the world me lives in.. thats wy me a pacifist..an cos war will neva solve fuk all.. it will only lead 2 anotha set of problems an ultimately resentments an conflicts... history proves it..an so far humanity hasnt learn sod all from history.. cept how 2 fite wars an kill peeps an how not 2 run a planet!!
A sincere ansa...
wtf me ansa this in ere..tee hee.. silly cow!!
the person below me has jus has is or er arse bored by me lil diatribe...:bigrin: