I'm male and circumcised. I think that circumcised looks better because I like to see the head of a cock. I am not against uncircumcised cocks as there are advantages to that such as when it comes to docking.
Printable View
I'm male and circumcised. I think that circumcised looks better because I like to see the head of a cock. I am not against uncircumcised cocks as there are advantages to that such as when it comes to docking.
Male
Cut
Im a bisexual married male, im cut and like both uncut and cut.....:tongue:
i am cut and my boyfriend is cut to ,, and he has a nice big one to :bigrin:
tho i don't mined cut or uncut but thy have to be very clean wont put a dirty penis in my mouth or my butt :tong:
and yes my butt is very clean :rolleyes:
:bipride::bipride::bipride::bipride::bipride:
rcdoak@gmail.com id like to say that i love all cock cut or uncut i cant see enough cock anyone wanna email me thier photos of thier cocks id love to see them all are welcome:flag3:
WOW. . . . one can get all the info thy need from this thread, This Dick-Head lost its collar at birth, so I'm also one of the ones "had no choice" but not a problem with me, I'm just thankful mine works !!! :male:Oh yeah, if you don't believe me ck my profile . . . :cutelaugh
GAYAZN, thanks for proving a point I wondered over for a long time. Gay men prefer uncut and push that agenda to no end. Medical research clearly indicates that cut is much cleaner and help stops the spread of HPV and other STDs.
In the partners of uncut males, Uteren Cancer, Colorectal Cancer and throat cancer is much more prevalent due to the spread of HPV. And now the push to get vaccinated to prevent the spread of HPV is lead by Big Pharma, who have everything to gain ($$$) by going against circumcision with lobbiests who fight to have curcumcission delisted from their insurance coverage, and pushing their meds. instead. This bull crap about mutiliation is just that, crap.
By the way, I'm cut and very happy with it.
I am a bi male and am cut. I will only do cut. There are too many uncuts that dont clean properly, so I will NOT even consider them.Quote:
Originally Posted by ourwildfun
Well that post just tells me you are one of the nasty uncuts that dont care what is hiding in your sleeve. I have seen everything from just plain dirt to even bugs there. I would take a smelly fish( with protection) or a bug infested dirty cock any day. Oh and I do see you are from south america where cleanlyness isnt a priority.
I would like to tell you that I am a white american but I cant since my dad is Mexican and my mother is Indian. As for your comment of what I seen you are wrong as you werent there! I do agree it should be easy to clean but people are lazy and dont clean the best. I dont want to get into an arguement but I wrote my opinion of what I HAVE seen on or in the forskin. a I will NOT address the other remark as you are way off base. I will say go read up on the sastistics on the uncleanliness and the problems of people with forskin they are stagering, and yes I do cansider my self a clean Amearican.Quote:
Originally Posted by BadBoyBilly
Alright, I was going to comment on how pathetic the gay guy is with his pussy reference, but bugs in a penis???? Now that took me off guard... Like under the foreskin? PLease elaborate :) I have been with cut and uncut and never saw a damn bug.....Quote:
Originally Posted by AlBaresAll
now onto other things.....
What I do find totally more disgusting and nasty is a rude 65 year old gay man with a fetish for "dirty piss-soaked and cum-encrusted jockstraps, underwear and any other dirty, raunchy gear!" who also seeks "jockstraps. Especially dirty, cum and piss-stained ones. I love to wear them, sniff them and stuff the funky pouch in my mouth while I wank."
with all that... He's no authority on what's clean and proper, specially when it comes to a woman's vagina.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadBoyBilly
DON'T KNOW WHERE YOU GET YOUR #S BUT 30% global prevalence AND YOU 90% IS 120% we all know your point
Prevalence
Main article: Prevalence of circumcision
Map published by the United Nations (WHO/UNAIDS) showing percentage of males who have been circumcised, at a country level. Data was provided by MEASURE DHS [2] and other sources. [3]Estimates of the proportion of males that are circumcised worldwide vary from one-sixth[51] to a third.[52] The WHO has estimated that 664,500,000 males aged 15 and over are circumcised (30% global prevalence), with almost 70% of these being Muslim.[8] Circumcision is most prevalent in the Muslim world, parts of South East Asia, Africa, the United States, The Philippines, Israel, and South Korea. It is relatively rare in Europe, Latin America, parts of Southern Africa, and most of Asia and Oceania. Prevalence is near-universal in the Middle East and Central Asia.[8] The WHO states that "there is generally little non-religious circumcision in Asia, with the exceptions of the Republic of Korea and the Philippines".[8] The WHO presents a map of estimated prevalence in which the level is generally low (< 20%) across Europe,[8] and Klavs et al report findings that "support the notion that the prevalence is low in Europe".[53] In Latin America, prevalence is universally low.[54] Estimates for individual countries include Spain[55], Colombia[55] and Denmark[56] less than 2%, Finland[57] and Brazil[55] 7%, Taiwan[58] 9%, Thailand[55] 13%, New Zealand[59] less than 20% and Australia[31] 58.7%.
The WHO estimates prevalence in the United States and Canada at 75% and 30%, respectively.[8] Prevalence in Africa varies from less than 20% in some southern African countries to near universal in North and West Africa.[54]
AND http://www.livescience.com/health/07...nsitivity.html
Nevertheless, based on the data from the three African clinical trials, Sullivan and colleagues conclude that "it is likely that circumcision will decrease the probability of a man acquiring HIV via penile--vaginal sex with an HIV-infected woman in the US." Until public health recommendations are available for the US, they say, "some sexually active men may consider circumcision as an additional HIV prevention measure, but should do so only in consultation with their physician or health care provider, and with a clear understanding of the costs and risks of circumcision and the need to continue use of other, proven prevention measures (e.g., reducing the numbers of sex partners and using condoms consistently and correctly). Men who choose to be circumcised should also be counseled about the importance of refraining from sexual intercourse following circumcision, until wound healing is complete. Men should also understand th at male circumcision has only proven effective in reducing the risk of infection through insertive vaginal sex."
Citation: Sullivan PS, Kilmarx PH, Peterman TA, Taylor AW, Nakashima AK, et al. (2007) Male circumcision for prevention of HIV transmission: What the new data mean for HIV prevention in the United States. PLoS Med 4(7): e223.
Further Information: http://medicine.plosjournals.org/per...l.pmed.0040223
Also from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0724113945.htm
Nevertheless, based on the data from the three African clinical trials, Sullivan and colleagues conclude that "it is likely that circumcision will decrease the probability of a man acquiring HIV via penile--vaginal sex with an HIV-infected woman in the US." Until public health recommendations are available for the US, they say, "some sexually active men may consider circumcision as an additional HIV prevention measure, but should do so only in consultation with their physician or health care provider, and with a clear understanding of the costs and risks of circumcision and the need to continue use of other, proven prevention measures (e.g., reducing the numbers of sex partners and using condoms consistently and correctly). Men who choose to be circumcised should also be counseled about the importance of refraining from sexual intercourse following circumcision, until wound healing is complete. Men should also understand th at male circumcision has only proven effective in reducing the risk of infection through insertive vaginal sex."
Citation: Sullivan PS, Kilmarx PH, Peterman TA, Taylor AW, Nakashima AK, et al. (2007) Male circumcision for prevention of HIV transmission: What the new data mean for HIV prevention in the United States. PLoS Med 4(7): e223.
Further Information: http://medicine.plosjournals.org/per...l.pmed.0040223
and to think I just thought they look better
from http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/03/26...pes/index.html
Overall, circumcision reduced the men's risk of genital herpes by 28 percent (10.3 percent of uncircumcised men developed genital herpes compared with 7.8 percent of circumcised men) and HPV infection by 35 percent (27.8 percent of uncircumcised men were infected with HPV compared with 18 percent of circumcised men). Circumcision did not, however, protect against syphilis. (About 2 percent of men in both groups contracted syphilis.)
You didn't read the links. It is from NEW studies and no where says prevents it says reduces and the studies are from Africa, U.S.A. and other countries. no proof but that's what the studies are saying NOW not in the 50's look it up. I put just a few links on here there were a lot more with the same findings. believe it or not that's what is being said by medical professionals. You can argue all you want all I can do is read the facts and as a health care worker we get up dates that say the something's, studies change often for now and a while they are saying it REDUCES a few s.t.d.'s but not all. look them up and decide for your self's don't take my word. :male:
http://health.usnews.com/articles/he...inst-stds.html
or "google" does circumcision reduce std dont you just hate the "facts" now show a MEDICAL STUDY (not opnion or friends have or say.) that says these are wrong I find over 200 that say the samething
from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15593753/
"Circumcised males are less likely than their uncircumcised peers to acquire a sexually transmitted infection, the findings of a 25-year study suggest.
According to the report in the November issue of Pediatrics, circumcision may reduce the risk of acquiring and spreading such infections by up to 50 percent, which suggests "substantial benefits" for routine neonatal circumcision.
The current study is just one of many that have looked at this controversial topic. While most research has found that circumcision reduces the rates of HIV (the virus that causes AIDS), syphilis and genital ulcers, the results are more mixed for other STDs."
I am a cut male. A while back ago I had the opportunity to experience an uncut man for the first time. He was clean and a great kisser I might add. I am not in favor of mutilating babies. My personal preference is that he take care of himself and his cock be clean. Cut or uncut, it does not matter as long as he knows how to use his penis and is a good kisser.
I'm male and cut.
I've had equal cut and uncut cock, I must say I like the look of a cut cock but find an uncut cock easier to wank. My cock is very sensitive so I'm glad I didn't have a foreskin otherwise I'd cum very quickly!!
I wouldn't kick a guy out of bed for being uncut, so long as it's clean. I normally do this whilst in the shower with said man as part of an erotic shower and not making an issue of cleaning him. Likewise with a lady.
Interesting medical facts for you: jewish women have the lowest percentage of cervical cancer in the world - can this be attributed to their men being circumcised?
An uncircumcised man is more likely to get penile cancer and also has a higher chance of contracting HIV.
Personally I'm thankful I was circumcised when I was only a few days old, i don't remember being" mutilated " and I don't have to worry about having it done at a later date. One of my friends had to circumcised after he ripped his whilst having vigorous intercourse with his girlfriend!!
I've just realised that a person two threads above me has also posted about the STD's so I apologise for duplicating information.:)
WRONG!!!!! from the c.d.c READ THE LINKS I DIDN'T WRITE THEM
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/fac...rcumcision.htm
The strongest association was seen in men at high risk, such as patients at sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics, for whom the adjusted relative risk was 71% lower for circumcised men.
C.D.C. FINAL http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/fac...rcumcision.pdf
CDC HIV/AIDS Science Facts:
Male Circumcision and Risk for HIV
Transmission and Other Health Conditions:
Implications for the United States
After adjustment for confounding factors in the
population-based studies, the relative risk for HIV
infection was 44% lower in circumcised men. The
strongest association was seen in men at high risk,
such as patients at sexually transmitted disease
(STD) clinics, for whom the adjusted relative risk
was 71% lower for circumcised men.
Like I said find FACTS from a medical Study C.D.C., John Hopkins, AND MANY OTHERS SAY THE SAME THINGS so think you are right? try looking up FACTS, live in the dark up to you! no it in no way stops stds or takes the place of a protection but ALL MEDICAL STUDYS SAY IT REDUCES THEM INCLUDING C.D.C. I am in no way saying it should or should not be done just giving the medical facts several here think they know them but don't look up. like I said I work in health care so helth myths bug me. see I look things up be4 I quote them. SORRY THE FACTS MAM JUST THE FACTS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by IsItAllOverMyFace?
You don't read do you? I said it in no way takes the place of safe sex and so says the CDC and the rest. THEY say it REDUCES chances (I didn't say it medical studies do and none that I can find say otherwise) look them up unless you don't want to find you are wrong!. I (my wife and I both) do work health care, but if I (we)do or not is not the question. just follow the links and get the FACTS. Short of no sex latex condoms are the best. Want facts I posted them and links so everyone can find them as well as search key words. CDC site even says why if you read studies far enough. That should be enough.
thats what I have been saying use a condom. and that MEDICAL TESTING SAYS IT REDUCES NOT STOPS SOME STDS AND HIV. but then I asked anyone to find MEDICAL RESEARCH that says otherwise not opnions, friends and so on RESEARCH. someone a while said it did then not so I did something stupid I looked up FACTS. but then I find there are a lot here that know more than Centers for Disease Control (CDC) posted and World Health Organization WHO on that web says. (follow link it's not my words) must be great to be that smart.
http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/
There is compelling evidence that male circumcision reduces the risk of heterosexually acquired HIV infection in men by approximately 60%. Three randomized controlled trials have shown that male circumcision provided by well trained health professionals in properly equipped settings is safe. WHO/UNAIDS recommendations emphasize that male circumcision should be considered an efficacious intervention for HIV prevention in countries and regions with heterosexual epidemics, high HIV and low male circumcision prevalence. Male circumcision provides only partial protection, and therefore should be only one element of a comprehensive HIV prevention package
I am male, cut and prefer cut.
im male, uncut and i prefer uncut ...just, but im not fussy .
I do think a nice fat cock with a throbbing red bell end just halfway peeking out of the tight foreskin is incredibly sexy.
male/cut
i prefer cut
I am cut male and prefer cut.
I am a cut male...I prefer cut males also
I am a male with a cut cock and have only had one experience with a uncut cock and really don't remember it was already hard when I sucked on it and he unloaded up my ass and never had another one since, but don't care either way