interracial sterotype

[nbboy1123]

Something I seem to notice a lot in gay interracial porn is that it's always a black top and white bottom. As a top bi guy I have a hard time finding white top/black bottom gay porn. I'm not sure why this seems to be so rare, I would assume there are more guys like me out there because I've been with bottom black guys. Am I the only one who notices this and why do you think it is this way?

[FalconAngel]

Except for a small handful of straight porn from the 70's, almost all of the inter-racial porn films are like that, but even the straight i/r porn is Black guy/White girl.

I blame political correctness gone awry.

It's too bad that there are not more i/r videos where there are more White guy/Black girl and White top/Black bottom.

[nbboy1123]

Except for a small handful of straight porn from the 70's, almost all of the inter-racial porn films are like that, but even the straight i/r porn is Black guy/White girl.

I blame political correctness gone awry.

It's too bad that there are not more i/r videos where there are more White guy/Black girl and White top/Black bottom.


I kinda think the same way...it's a way of making it look like no "sex slaves" involved

[TaylorMade]

Or... the myth of the mandingo /black buck is at work.

*Taylor*

[rissababynta]

I never noticed before...

[12voltman59]

As someone said--it is that age old "mandingo/big black buck with big cock" fantasy going--a staid white person "letting go" and letting the wild black manimal "taking" her/him with that big old black cock, sexually ravishing them all night long and into the next day!!!

There never was the notion of a white "going crazy" on a black person sexually and as far as old things going on----there is the PCish idea that a white having sex with a black is the old "massa/slave" thing going on and that is a "bad thing."

It just seems so much "sexier" that the black is the sexual aggressor and the white is the sexual subserviant--no matter the gender of the parties. Kind of a turnaround of the way things were in black and white relationships--at least legally---since whites had the power--but there is some evidence that the idea that whites long held sexual fantasies of their slaves "taking them" sexually goes way back--even before the beginning of whites owning black slaves in the new world.

So, old stereotypes and myths going bothways are at play in this.

Don't count on it changing anytime soon.

We might have a black (or as they used to say "a mulatto") as president---but we still have lots of old racial things floating around out there in our collective mind.

And as far as porn is concerned---it is hardly thoughtful stuff--it is designed to appeal to the least common denominator aspects of our natures---its stock and trade is all about cliches and stereotypes of all kinds--that is one of the reasons I pretty much hate porn of all types. It is not designed to appeal to the intellect--- porn pretty much is designed to "offend the intellect" and goes for the primal aspects of our natures.

The other thing though in regards to you finding more black on white porn--if there were a big market for white on black sex---they would produce a helluva lot more of it since porn producers are the ultimate capitalists-----they provide a product to fill a "market want or need" and there is obviously a big market for porn showing black guys with big cocks fucking the lights out of whites---either chicks or guys and not as much of a market for porn showing white guys fucking the lights out of black dudes or chicks. (there is some market for white on black--but the number of this type of porn seems to be much less than black on white)

When you talk about this subject--you sure do walk into a thick briar patch---complete with plenty of hornets nests in there----so many strains of hundreds of years of black/white relationships that this touches on.

This was an interesting piece I found on the net that gets into some of these points, even though its main jist is "black woman as Jezebel":
http://www.ferris.edu/jimcrow/jezebel/

[wildwestgoob]

And on *that* note... also remember the old phrase bigger is better... (didn't say it was TRUE, just cliché)

Like the guy posed in the video I posted, with ensuing thread from hell, would you rather watch a porn with some guy doing "x" if he had a small prick, or would you rather watch a porn with some guy with a HUGE prick flogging the daylights out of "x"...?

Well, what's allegedly bigger than a black man?
(I beg to differ with that comment by the way)

I have a black male friend, who is average in size, (average even on a dorky white guy's scale of measurement) and he is a total bottom, and enjoys every minute with "his cute lil redneck lover".

So yes, I *do* empathize with your lack of porn in your particular flavor.

Pm me ;)

[darkeyes]

And on *that* note... also remember the old phrase bigger is better... (didn't say it was TRUE, just cliché)

Like the guy posed in the video I posted, with ensuing thread from hell, would you rather watch a porn with some guy doing "x" if he had a small prick, or would you rather watch a porn with some guy with a HUGE prick flogging the daylights out of "x"...?

Well, what's allegedly bigger than a black man?
(I beg to differ with that comment by the way)

I have a black male friend, who is average in size, (average even on a dorky white guy's scale of measurement) and he is a total bottom, and enjoys every minute with "his cute lil redneck lover".

So yes, I *do* empathize with your lack of porn in your particular flavor.

Pm me ;)

Actually in me own personal "research" (admittedly sum years back..) didn find much 2 choose tween black guys an ne otha, but didn "investigate" a lotta black guys so thats a bit unreliable.. but dus seem 2 memba a cuppla years bak ther wos a survey a willie size dun by sum academic wich did seem 2 confrim that they r indeed a buncha big knobs.. seems white peeps wer laggin behind ther but it wos the poor ole guys from the Indian sub-continent who brought up the rear so 2 speak wen it cums 2 size (nev found much diff ther eitha, but 'gain based on a ver limited sample)..

..don hav time rite now 2 research it but ya all kno as well as me that research can b a ratha dodgy thing 'pon wich 2 rely...

[Annika L]

Actually in me own personal "research" (admittedly sum years back..) didn find much 2 choose tween black guys an ne otha, but didn "investigate" a lotta black guys so thats a bit unreliable.. but dus seem 2 memba a cuppla years bak ther wos a survey a willie size dun by sum academic wich did seem 2 confrim that they r indeed a buncha big knobs.. seems white peeps wer laggin behind ther but it wos the poor ole guys from the Indian sub-continent who brought up the rear so 2 speak wen it cums 2 size (nev found much diff ther eitha, but 'gain based on a ver limited sample)..

..don hav time rite now 2 research it but ya all kno as well as me that research can b a ratha dodgy thing 'pon wich 2 rely...

Yes, Fran, it can...but...um...what exactly would you propose as a less dodgy alternative? Anecdotal evidence from a handful of friends or posters? One's own limited experience? Certainly not "conventional wisdom"?!

Of course any research can be flawed or employ questionable methodology...but it's also the best tool we have for trying to understand anything. It just needs to be conducted intelligently and viewed with an informed eye (and the viewing public tends to fall down here *much* more often than the researchers themselves, at least with peer-reviewed published research).

[darkeyes]

Yes, Fran, it can...but...um...what exactly would you propose as a less dodgy alternative? Anecdotal evidence from a handful of friends or posters? One's own limited experience? Certainly not "conventional wisdom"?!

Of course any research can be flawed or employ questionable methodology...but it's also the best tool we have for trying to understand anything. It just needs to be conducted intelligently and viewed with an informed eye (and the viewing public tends to fall down here *much* more often than the researchers themselves, at least with peer-reviewed published research).

U talkin bout willie size research or research in genral yummie 1? Am not condemnin research for God's sake Annika..hasta happen me knos that as well as ne 1.. but it is sumtimes flawed an we kno it..indeed it prob always is flawed 2 sum degree.. sum is more reliable than others... the post wos meant as a lil lite relief not as owt else... don disagree wiv owt ya sez ifya take it seriously..muah.. :tong: