PDA

View Full Version : Why the sudden influx of minors on this site??



vittoria
Feb 11, 2008, 11:23 PM
I'm not getting this... how are they getting in? They say they're 18 on their profile, but in chat they are 16 from new jersey.

Children, or Feds passing as children trying to beef up their quotas.

The weirdness abounds lately!

Doggie_Wood
Feb 12, 2008, 12:11 AM
Vitty - we all know that the only way to keep most kids out is for the administrators to install safe-guards such as used on porn sites. The use of credit cards for age verification. Drew, you, myself nor anyone else can prevent the little buggers from lying then gaining access to the site.
All we can do is when they admit in the chat room to being underage, copy the transcript and send it to Drew. let him handle it from there. And you can put the individual in question on ignore.
I know, I know - easier said than done, but I don't see any other recourse of action. Se la vie!

:doggie:

bisexualinsocal
Feb 12, 2008, 1:05 AM
Vitty - we all know that the only way to keep most kids out is for the administrators to install safe-guards such as used on porn sites. The use of credit cards for age verification. Drew, you, myself nor anyone else can prevent the little buggers from lying then gaining access to the site.
All we can do is when they admit in the chat room to being underage, copy the transcript and send it to Drew. let him handle it from there. And you can put the individual in question on ignore.
I know, I know - easier said than done, but I don't see any other recourse of action. Se la vie!

:doggie:


Thanks. That's exactly what I'm going to start doing. Actually, things would be a lot easier on all of us if people just stopped putting pictures of their dicks on their profile. Not only is it tasteless and desperate, but it makes this a website unsuitable for children and exposes the sites owners to 2257 legalities and that means bye bye bisexual.com.

How about straightening them out too? We're bisexual, not desperate.

bisexualinsocal
Feb 12, 2008, 1:07 AM
Vitty - we all know that the only way to keep most kids out is for the administrators to install safe-guards such as used on porn sites. The use of credit cards for age verification. Drew, you, myself nor anyone else can prevent the little buggers from lying then gaining access to the site.
All we can do is when they admit in the chat room to being underage, copy the transcript and send it to Drew. let him handle it from there. And you can put the individual in question on ignore.
I know, I know - easier said than done, but I don't see any other recourse of action. Se la vie!

:doggie:


Thanks. That's exactly what I'm going to start doing. Actually, things would be a lot easier on all of us if people just stopped putting pictures of their dicks on their profile. Not only is it tasteless and desperate, but it makes this a website unsuitable for children and exposes the sites owners to 2257 legalities and that means bye bye bisexual.com.

How about straightening them out too? We're bisexual, not desperate.

GreenEyedLady(GEL)
Feb 12, 2008, 7:05 AM
Thanks. That's exactly what I'm going to start doing. Actually, things would be a lot easier on all of us if people just stopped putting pictures of their dicks on their profile. Not only is it tasteless and desperate, but it makes this a website unsuitable for children and exposes the sites owners to 2257 legalities and that means bye bye bisexual.com.

How about straightening them out too? We're bisexual, not desperate.

I am pretty sure you just offended a large number of people by stating that by them showing their dicks , they are desperate. Infact its quite a blunder. If you don't want to see it , dont look. There are plenty of people here who want to. And yes your right , it does make this site unsuitable for children, yanno why ? hmm , well , its NOT for children. lol This is not a porn site. This is a bisexual community with the rights to expose your body in your profile if you so chose. The pictures are merely thumbnails , you have to click into it to get a better look. Not to mention if its X rated, you place it in the X rated category and its not visible at all.

Sex in Words
Feb 12, 2008, 7:24 AM
I won't get into what happens in the chat, because I never use it, but this issue has always been a challenging one for me. On one hand, this is a community and in any community, there is sexual connection. So, while I do personally find it a bit crass, I don't object to people exposing skin as their profile pic.
On the other hand, I am a big supporter of making this community, and any other for that matter, open and useful for youth—many of whom are very much at risk because they are exploring and trying to understand their sexuality. The supportive members here, the threads in the forum and the feature articles, are all meant to educate and entertain, and youth, in their difficult period, can greatly benefit.
So, I remain divided on the issue...

Skater Boy
Feb 12, 2008, 11:16 AM
SOMEBODY has to dig up all the coal, minerals, metal ores and diamonds that the the world consumes. And I see NO REASON why any of them shouldn't have bisexual tendencies too. so there! :bigrin:

TaylorMade
Feb 12, 2008, 11:31 AM
SOMEBODY has to dig up all the coal, minerals, metal ores and diamonds that the the world consumes. And I see NO REASON why any of them shouldn't have bisexual tendencies too. so there! :bigrin:

That is sooo wrong. So. Very. Wrong.

Funny as hell tho.

Anyhow... what IS the AOC here? I mean whose country's rules are we going by?

Canada has 16.

US has ...18?

UK has 16 or something. . .

Whose rules are we playing by? I admit I'm going by 18 b/c the lawyer of any overenthusiastic parent can argue something else (maybe some bs about jurisdiction and reasonable expectation) in front of a judge if the kid is 16,17.

Like I've said... one overenthusiastic parent is all it takes.

*Taylor*

**Peg**
Feb 12, 2008, 11:54 AM
I'm not getting this... how are they getting in? They say they're 18 on their profile, but in chat they are 16 from new jersey.

Children, or Feds passing as children trying to beef up their quotas.

The weirdness abounds lately!

hi Vitt,

my personal experience has been that the "kids" here might be, in reality, cops trying to lure pedophiles.

In another chat room, an acquaintance of mine raised SUCH a stink about these "underage children", that the owners closed down the very rooms that the cops were using to lure the pedophiles into contacting kids. 23 investigations went for naught.

sometimes, but not always, things are not what they appear to be.

food for thought

**Peg**

Skater Boy
Feb 12, 2008, 12:12 PM
That is sooo wrong. So. Very. Wrong.

Funny as hell tho.

Anyhow... what IS the AOC here? I mean whose country's rules are we going by?

Canada has 16.

US has ...18?

UK has 16 or something. . .

Whose rules are we playing by? I admit I'm going by 18 b/c the lawyer of any overenthusiastic parent can argue something else (maybe some bs about jurisdiction and reasonable expectation) in front of a judge if the kid is 16,17.

Like I've said... one overenthusiastic parent is all it takes.

*TKay*

Yeah, AOC is 16 in the UK. But I think on the internet in general, where pornography is concerned, its 18 and over only. And, where there is variation in the AOC its usually best to go with the highest, just to be on the safe side.

Personally, I've never encountered any problems. I did have an interested 17 year old contact me once (which, technically, is legal here), but it was too close for my liking... I'm too pretty to got to jail. Well, actually I'm not that pretty. But I'm STILL not goin' to jail!!! Better safe than... sharing a cell with an over-friendly redneck. ;)

TaylorMade
Feb 12, 2008, 12:18 PM
Yeah, AOC is 16 in the UK. But I think on the internet in general, where pornography is concerned, its 18 and over only. And, where there is variation in the AOC its usually best to go with the highest, just to be on the safe side.

Personally, I've never encountered any problems. I did have an interested 17 year old contact me once (which, technically, is legal here), but it was too close for my liking... I'm too pretty to got to jail. Well, actually I'm not that pretty. But I'm STILL not goin' to jail!!! Better safe than... sharing a cell with an over-friendly redneck. ;)

They don't have rednecks in the UK. . .they have chavs.

And I don't know if they cotton to bi people much.

*Taylor*

FalconAngel
Feb 12, 2008, 12:22 PM
What everyone seems to be forgetting is this one simple truth;

That no matter what they are; minors or cops posing as minors, when you close down one place that they come in, they will find another. Any cop on the street can tell you that.

If they are kids, then they should be removed until they are really adults. If they are cops posing as kids, then they are not going to tell you anyway.

I recall that you are expected to indicate that you are 18 or older when you sign up on this site, so they are lying if they are under 18 and sign up.

All we can do is to report the minors that we find so that they can be removed.

I like to think that we don't have any pedophiles lurking on this site, but if the feds are on it posing as kids, then they probably suspect (realistically or not) that there are a few here.
Of course, if they suspect it only because this is a Bi site, then shame on them for it.

nothings5d
Feb 12, 2008, 12:36 PM
hi Vitt,

my personal experience has been that the "kids" here might be, in reality, cops trying to lure pedophiles.

In another chat room, an acquaintance of mine raised SUCH a stink about these "underage children", that the owners closed down the very rooms that the cops were using to lure the pedophiles into contacting kids. 23 investigations went for naught.

sometimes, but not always, things are not what they appear to be.

food for thought

**Peg**

Well, I hope we don't have any pedophiles around here, and though if they got caught here it might mean trouble for the site and a big stink in the media. "Today an internet pedophile named ***** ****** was arrested by federal agents who had been using an alias on a forum called bisexual.com." That would just feed into the propaganda machine of Phelps. But if there are any I would rather they get caught than remain at large. And I bet Drew does too...


Posting Rules:
3. Sexual freedom is what it's all about, but even it should have limits - discussions of non-consensual sex, violence and sex, or sex involving children are not welcome here, will be promptly deleted, and the poster may be banned.

Skater Boy
Feb 12, 2008, 12:42 PM
They don't have rednecks in the UK. . .they have chavs.

And I don't know if they cotton to bi people much.

*Taylor*

Good point. Although either way, jail doesn't seem like a nice place... if I'm gonna be someone's bitch, I'd prefer to do it voluntarily, rather than over the threat of being "shanked" with a sharpened toothbrush. :eek:

TaylorMade
Feb 12, 2008, 12:54 PM
Good point. Although either way, jail doesn't seem like a nice place... if I'm gonna be someone's bitch, I'd prefer to do it voluntarily, rather than over the threat of being "shanked" with a sharpened toothbrush. :eek:

Hello new slogan:

Consent! It makes sex fun! :bigrin:

*Taylor*

DiamondDog
Feb 12, 2008, 2:42 PM
There are sites for GLBT youth, and even actual resource centers/group meetings for GLBT youth/teenagers, and this site isn't one of them.

csrakate
Feb 12, 2008, 2:58 PM
I won't get into what happens in the chat, because I never use it, but this issue has always been a challenging one for me. On one hand, this is a community and in any community, there is sexual connection. So, while I do personally find it a bit crass, I don't object to people exposing skin as their profile pic.
On the other hand, I am a big supporter of making this community, and any other for that matter, open and useful for youth—many of whom are very much at risk because they are exploring and trying to understand their sexuality. The supportive members here, the threads in the forum and the feature articles, are all meant to educate and entertain, and youth, in their difficult period, can greatly benefit.
So, I remain divided on the issue...

I agree that many times a minor may come here looking for advice or counsel...unfortunately, the majority of the minors who seem to frequent the chat room are not looking for guidance or advice but seem to be looking for a sexual hookup. Very often they may have written 18 as their age in the profile, but when in private, they confess to being younger. Some of them are so bold as to announce it as they enter the main room. THIS is a red flag situation and not one any of us want to deal with on this site. And even if no one engages them in a private chat, the conversations in the chat room are very often laced with sexual innuendo and are not appropriate to be shared with minors. With that being said, just how fair is it that we should alter our conversations OR our pictures to suit younger visitors? They don't belong here, plain and simple. We need to continue to be vigilant when it comes to underage chatters and inform them ASAP that they must leave. If they refuse, do as Dogwood suggested and report them to Drew. This is an adult site and we have every right to keep it as such.

Hugs,
Kate

darkeyes
Feb 12, 2008, 3:29 PM
Mayb we jus shorta coal V...middle a winta..need 2 get heat from sumwer.. tee hee:bigrin:

diB4u
Feb 12, 2008, 5:23 PM
They don't have rednecks in the UK. . .they have chavs.

And I don't know if they cotton to bi people much.

*Taylor*


Chavs... Ahh, the chaves of faked designer goods, dont you just love them...

I love and hate ALL PPL. Get me on a good day, and im as sweet as apple pie mom/mum used to make.

Catch me on a bad day, and im as sour as apple pie I cant make lol...

:tongue::2cents::tongue::bigrin:;)

Skater Boy
Feb 12, 2008, 5:41 PM
Chavs... Ahh, the chaves of faked designer goods, dont you just love them...

No, I most certainly do NOT. There's a special place reserved in the deepest pit of Hell itself for all Chavs, IMO. Not so much for aesthetic reasons (as those I could forgive). But its the "attitude" that gets my goat... reminds me of my rebellious teenage years, except with them it seems to be a permanent lifestyle aspiration... :rolleyes:

chulainn2
Feb 12, 2008, 5:58 PM
I had a user awhile back, pm me and started asking me about how young I like them and that he(?) had been having sex with 14 yo's and wanted to know if I was interested in details and if I had sex with underage and what where the details.
Clearly either a real sicko or fed. I told him I was not interested in this subject, ended our conerstaion immediately and forwarded his user name to Drew with a note of what happened.
Havent seen him here since.
So they do exist in the general chat room.

diB4u
Feb 12, 2008, 6:01 PM
No, I most certainly do NOT. There's a special place reserved in the deepest pit of Hell itself for all Chavs, IMO. Not so much for aesthetic reasons (as those I could forgive). But its the "attitude" that gets my goat... reminds me of my rebellious teenage years, except with them it seems to be a permanent lifestyle aspiration... :rolleyes:



LOL.... Maybe its me then, cause its cheap as chips lol...Ah as long as they last blah who cares?

All jokes aside, yeah they the Feds or the special forces who control and mointor such things as chatrooms, etc, do have ppl who are pretending to be children.
My advice if they sound youthful, then listen to your gut reactions.

Skater Boy
Feb 12, 2008, 6:10 PM
LOL.... Maybe its me then, cause its cheap as chips lol...Ah as long as they last blah who cares?

Well, Lily Allen is the closest thing to "Chav" that I can appreciate. But I'll say no more on the issue...

bisexualinsocal
Feb 12, 2008, 7:48 PM
I am pretty sure you just offended a large number of people by stating that by them showing their dicks , they are desperate. Infact its quite a blunder. If you don't want to see it , dont look. There are plenty of people here who want to. And yes your right , it does make this site unsuitable for children, yanno why ? hmm , well , its NOT for children. lol This is not a porn site. This is a bisexual community with the rights to expose your body in your profile if you so chose. The pictures are merely thumbnails , you have to click into it to get a better look. Not to mention if its X rated, you place it in the X rated category and its not visible at all.


Pictures of your genitalia constitute pornography. I'm not calling it good or bad, I'm simply stating the obvious. If you put enough pictures of your dick on this website, it becomes a de facto porn site. And if I offended anyone desperate enough to put their dick on their profile, well, I don't know what to tell you.

I think this website would suit itself better if it remained pornography free and appeal to the broader market.

vittoria
Feb 12, 2008, 8:21 PM
"Hold on to your butts"---Samuel L. Jackson, Jurassic Park


Unfortunately, theres dozens of sites which dont qualify as "porn" sites that have chat rooms and so forth, for example, megamates.com where people place pictures of their "belongings". Its not classified as a "de facto" ( Latin rox) site. Everyone has their choices (theres that word again) as to whether or not people should put their "X-Rated" pics up. Either you do or you dont..

Be that as it may, it's our responsibility as adults (:eek: ) to make conscious decisions on what to put as a profile picture or anything else. While it is true that placing genital pictures is tantamount to porn.. (ooooo... thats a $50 dollar word), for those persons who even have FACE pictures up it could cause its own form of dilemma...which is why a lot of persons dont even do THAT.

Each to his (or her) own average :)

Just leave the fkkn kids/Feds/pervs out of it

Delilah
Feb 12, 2008, 8:41 PM
I am a member of PervertedJustice.com forum site. They have explain in details that they can not go into an adult site and entrap people.
They go into children base type chat rooms and sit there until hit on by an adult (also pretending to be a child themselves). The people of PervertedJustice.com never approach a child in those chat rooms. They don't know who is an actual child and who is the pedophiles. They sit in the chat room and start chatting to those that initiate the PVT. That's how they snatch those pervs. They have teamed up with NBC's Dateline "To Catch A Preditor". It's an interesting show and the looks on those pervs is sooooo funny. But it is scary. Ever watch that show? Look how many they have caught! One of the perpetrator even said on the show, "oh my God, I watch your show all the time.".... um and you still try to hit on a minor??? LOL
On the PervertedJustice.com website, you get to read all those transcript that is saved on the yahoo, aol, msn's chat log. You can see who starts the PVT, it's those pervs.

krrptyc
Feb 12, 2008, 10:27 PM
Pictures of your genitalia constitute pornography. I'm not calling it good or bad, I'm simply stating the obvious. If you put enough pictures of your dick on this website, it becomes a de facto porn site. And if I offended anyone desperate enough to put their dick on their profile, well, I don't know what to tell you.

I think this website would suit itself better if it remained pornography free and appeal to the broader market.

I wonder how many million websites there are where one can engage in chat suitable for people of all ages? Sites where you can post a picture of yourself (but not naked) and perhaps find someone who shares your views. OK, maybe there aren't millions but this is the only site I have found that I can share my experiences or hear about someone else's bisexual experiences in adult or even explicit language that I am not hounded to "upgrade" my membershipand pay a monthly fee so I can "access other gold members." I can also see pictures of other bisexuals NAKED. I like naked. I also like the fact that everyone on this site is suppose to be over 18. If I proposition or engage in explicit chat with someone on this site the worse I can be is annoying or offensive. It is not criminal.

bisexualinsocal
Feb 12, 2008, 10:35 PM
I wonder how many million websites there are where one can engage in chat suitable for people of all ages? Sites where you can post a picture of yourself (but not naked) and perhaps find someone you shares your views. OK maybe there aren't millions but this is the only site I have found that I can share my experiences or hear about someones else's bisexual experiences in adult or even explicit language. I can also see pictures of other bisexuals NAKED. I like naked. No I haven't posted any naked pictures of myself yet but may in the future.
Another feature of this site is that people place ads to try and hookup with others. Should I decide to propassion

Yeah I like to see what I'm buying before I buy it, too. That's not the problem. The problem is that this site is readily available to the public, nude pictures at all. I'm not in favor of banning sexually explicit photo's, but I'd like to see some measure taken to make them available to new members only after they meet certain criteria (ie, a member for a number of weeks, a minimum number of posts [so we can measure maturity] etc etc.) In the absence of that, maybe new members could register and receive explicit photo's via private message.

Woahman
Feb 12, 2008, 11:05 PM
Well as a younger person on this site (well now that Ive been on here a few years not THAT young! anymore), I must admit I wasn't 18 when I came on here! but I used it to find out about things I couldn't find out anywhere else! We have to give some of them the benefit of the doubt I think.
And as for the recent influx.. it's sadly because it has become "popular" to be bi! why the hell that has come about is beyond me! but I've found that kids in school now days think it is "cool" to be bi and chicks making out with chicks for boys attention etc. Its kinda sad really unless they really are doing it for the right reasons..
I think it could also be because of the more open mindedness these days! which is a GREAT! thing imo.
I'm not condoning under agers being on here.. just giving another point of view.
As for the sick fucks out there.. yeah.. they are everywhere not just the internet, we can't protect the world from itself..

:color:P.L.U.R:color:

Woahman
Feb 12, 2008, 11:15 PM
Pictures of your genitalia constitute pornography. I'm not calling it good or bad, I'm simply stating the obvious. If you put enough pictures of your dick on this website, it becomes a de facto porn site. And if I offended anyone desperate enough to put their dick on their profile, well, I don't know what to tell you.

I think this website would suit itself better if it remained pornography free and appeal to the broader market.


This coming from a person that has been a member since Jan this year.. maybe you should hang around a bit more and get to know people a bit better before you go making comments like this.

lookn0ver
Feb 12, 2008, 11:42 PM
NO MINORS!!! no if &s or BUTTZ....its illegal !! grow up.:offtopic:

vittoria
Feb 13, 2008, 12:49 AM
Well Hot Damn! Kate and I agree totally on this!

Good Work Kate...

When credit is due, credit is given...

thanks for the 'right' answer to these people!

OG, you are getting more and more interesting :)

bisexualinsocal
Feb 13, 2008, 1:22 AM
Stop making excuses for parents that don't have control or don't watch or know what there kids are doing? This is an adult site.. and we shouldn't have to give up our adult freedoms or rights...

No one is asking you to give up any rights though the voice in your head might be telling you that.


this website is NOT SUPPOSE to be suitable for children.

Then why not offer up some responsible self-policing and keep the explicit stuff private? Last time I checked, the internet is open to the public. Just like a rational person wouldn't expose their dick at the supermarket, a rational person should not expose their dick, openly on the the internet.

Hey, if voyeurism is your thing, I have no problem with that. Just keep it in the privacy of your own viewing and bedroom.


AND it should be the responsibility of the parent to be sure their kid
isn't here..

The fact of the matter here is that there are CHILDREN on this site and they have OPEN AND FREE ACCESS TO ADULT PORNOGRAPHY!

When you see a kid shoplifting at the store, do you tell yourself "Well, I shouldn't do anything because that's the parents responsibility"? As adults, we have a responsibility to do what's right collectively. Yes it's the parent's responsibility but it's our responsibility to police ourselves.


Next thing you know.. you'll be resposible for the kid using the same rest room as you... stop it.

Well if you saw a kid raping another kid in a restroom, would you say "Well, that's the parents responsibility"?


I find bisexualinsocal to have some very strange ideas about American
society.. don't you?


Well now we get to the real point of your reply. Your reply is just a broader attack on my beliefs. Right, thought facist?

proseros
Feb 13, 2008, 2:19 AM
Ah'w c'mon.

People it's really not that serious enough to get into all these arguments about parents and cops and such. Didn't we just get over a bunch of trolls?

Well minors and cops are no different except that boys and girls will be boys and girls, and cops are doing a job that at the end of the day we all should be very glad is being done for the sake of children to begin with. We are not culpable for what they do. We are responsible for what WE do.

For one thing-This is NOT a porn site. It is an adult forum for those of specific orientation. Minors are obviously not logging into this site to see porn more than they are coming-and are/may be participating in these forums-to learn and understand something about bisexuality.

We are all adults and we are the only ones to be held accountable for our actions. We can either censor our own grown joys, or carry on within appropriate bounds responsibly. Any adult who plays around adult places on the Internet should have enough savvy, maturity and intelligence to make the kinds of concientious distinctions between things that adults are otherwise expected to-otherwise, you are probably a psycho because you just don't care, and you are not taking time to do more than exploit the freedom you have to be misheivous or indulge the mischief of others.

You are NOT going to stop minors from playing on the same ground together unless (1) you shut down the playground altogether (2) you set down personal some rules of conduct that you shouldn't expect children to heed-And therefore you are are responsible to protection of minors that does not harm or endanger them. If any adult parading around here were any minor they'd still be here for the same reason-to learn something about sexuality, about themselves, and to find a safe medium and environment in which to do it.

So for as much as I have to say to any minor here. IF you are not of age as required by your State legislation-

[1] DON'T LIE TO US ABOUT IT. We are bisexual adults and we live in an adult world before we live in a bisexual world. We understand that you are curious and want to learn, and it's good that you want to learn, and I am honored that you respect and trust any of us to allow you the same freedom that we may would have if we were you.

But I cannot respect you if you do not respect me and lie to me about your age. I would rather you were browsing this site than somewhere getting murdered, raped or infected with AIDS, and as long as you are doing that I have a responsibility to nuture your curiosity, to educate and protect you AS LONG AS I AM ABLE TO DO SO AS AN RESPONSIBLE ADULT. I may politely excuse myself, or advise you that you should be doing something else; or I may be divining glories or warning of pitfalls you may encounter in life, or I may be sharing my life experiences with you in a clean way-But I'm NOT trying to have sex with you either in thought word or deed.

You are still playing on adult ground and if you want to explore the things in this world you are better advised to explore them in a world compatible with that world you share with your peers. If there is none, create one yourself. There are plenty of you struggling to learn the same things, and perhaps you are better learning about yourselves with them.

And as for the rest of us:

Be patient, be kind and take time to distiguish the difference between the motivations of adults and the mischief of children (minors). If you yell at them and chase them away they will think that everything about themselves and what they are and what they feel and what they do is WRONG. They will hate themselves-and they will not trust us. In turn they are more likely to harm themselves with behavior that can be far far far more devestating that peeking at a little T D and A or talking about it in a silly forum.

I realise that my response in this thread may to some push the limits liberalism-Yet in the larger scheme of things it is really about time the grown-ups did grow up and realize that being an adult doesn't stop the world from giving up its secrets.

orallybi4cpl
Feb 13, 2008, 7:39 AM
No one is asking you to give up any rights though the voice in your head might be telling you that.



Then why not offer up some responsible self-policing and keep the explicit stuff private? Last time I checked, the internet is open to the public. Just like a rational person wouldn't expose their dick at the supermarket, a rational person should not expose their dick, openly on the the internet.

Hey, if voyeurism is your thing, I have no problem with that. Just keep it in the privacy of your own viewing and bedroom.



The fact of the matter here is that there are CHILDREN on this site and they have OPEN AND FREE ACCESS TO ADULT PORNOGRAPHY!

When you see a kid shoplifting at the store, do you tell yourself "Well, I shouldn't do anything because that's the parents responsibility"? As adults, we have a responsibility to do what's right collectively. Yes it's the parent's responsibility but it's our responsibility to police ourselves.



Well if you saw a kid raping another kid in a restroom, would you say "Well, that's the parents responsibility"?



Well now we get to the real point of your reply. Your reply is just a broader attack on my beliefs. Right, thought facist?

I bet this guy is a politician.. working for chaney...

a superdeligate? yeah that's him...

geeez... I bet your mom is in a rest home and you don't care.

ever read about people similar to you? lee harvey osward

he was a loner too.. had some very strange ideas about
this country.

enjoy... they say ignorance is bliss

blackout
Feb 13, 2008, 8:06 AM
I bet this guy is a politician..

And I bet you and Oralguy are one and the same.

Doggie_Wood
Feb 13, 2008, 9:57 AM
I bet this guy is a politician.. working for chaney...

a superdeligate? yeah that's him...

geeez... I bet your mom is in a rest home and you don't care.

ever read about people similar to you? lee harvey osward

he was a loner too.. had some very strange ideas about
this country.

enjoy... they say ignorance is bliss

you must be OG - you're all over the map - IGGY TIME!

ziggybabie
Feb 13, 2008, 7:29 PM
Not talking about minors, but sometimes it seems like there are not as many 20s-30s age groups on here as there are 40s-50s.....I know....off topic, but it'd be cool to see more "younger" members joining in larger numbers.....just not young as in "minors" young.

Maybe I'm exaggerating the age numbers. I dunno.

bisexualinsocal
Feb 13, 2008, 7:57 PM
I bet this guy is a politician.. working for chaney...

a superdeligate? yeah that's him...

geeez... I bet your mom is in a rest home and you don't care.

ever read about people similar to you? lee harvey osward

he was a loner too.. had some very strange ideas about
this country.

enjoy... they say ignorance is bliss

First you're paranoid that I'm trying to get you to give up your rights.

Then you're suspicious that I'm working for Chaney, I don't know who that is. Maybe, Cheney?

Then, in you're hysteria, I'm now a superdelegate? :cutelaugh

Do you do drugs? Seriously. Either you're a drug user or you have some sort of trauma in your personal history. Either way, you are suffering from delusion. I don't mean that as a strict insult either. I think you are truly delusional. With the umbrella of suspicion you place over others, I peg you as suffering from either bipolar disorder, melancholic depression or a lot of both.

I've never been accused of working for Vice President Cheney, nor have I ever been bitten by the chupacabra or been to Area 51. I know you haven't accused me of either (yet), but I wanted to put your mind at ease on both those possibilities.

However I may or may not be reading your personal emails, easedropping on your Verizon phone calls and I'm stealing your brainwaves.

To prevent the latter, I suggest you invest in some of this-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tin_foil_hat

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e3/Tinfoilhat.jpg

vittoria
Feb 13, 2008, 9:12 PM
i followed the trail of pee... here!!!!!!! no pissing contests, just palaber to figure out what can be done... HUGS!!!

nothings5d
Feb 14, 2008, 7:44 AM
bisexualinsocal, you seem to take many of the posts that are responses to your posts as personal attacks. Granted I've seen a few posts that are personal attacks against you, but many of them were attacks against your VIEWS not you yourself.

vittoria, first time I've seen that picture posted anywhere but 4chan.

Woahman
Feb 14, 2008, 3:40 PM
vittoria, first time I've seen that picture posted anywhere but 4chan.

w00000t 4chan ftw!! /b/ represent!

vittoria
Feb 14, 2008, 10:06 PM
GMTA~~ :tong:





V

Eddie altamonte
Feb 15, 2008, 12:37 AM
hi Vitt,

my personal experience has been that the "kids" here might be, in reality, cops trying to lure pedophiles.

In another chat room, an acquaintance of mine raised SUCH a stink about these "underage children", that the owners closed down the very rooms that the cops were using to lure the pedophiles into contacting kids. 23 investigations went for naught.

sometimes, but not always, things are not what they appear to be.

food for thought

**Peg**

I agree the cybercops have their bait all over the net. Guess what? they waste their time in here! The members of this community are the greatest group of people i have ever seen come together