Wonder(land) Woman [Archive]

pepperjack

Jul 20, 2015, 7:26 PM

This woman was at our country club yesterday as a guest speaker http://www.marieclaire.com/sex-love/advice/a5268/porn-star-boyfriend/ Interesting story in my Monday morning paper which is usually pretty dull. Have seen the movie a couple of times now. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0335563/?ref_=nv_sr_4

pole_smoker

Jul 20, 2015, 7:42 PM

*yawn* She was a bisexual porn guy's slampiece/ho on the side, and now she wants to become 'famous' because of this. :rolleyes:

She's also a scam artist, professional grifter-has been since she was 15 and still is, pathological liar, pretends to be a 'victim' when she knew fully well what she was doing decades ago, and is now Holmes' ex wife's legal guardian, which was a mistake on Sharon Holmes' part. :rolleyes:

I saw the movie wonderland it was not that accurate, had more than a few errors, and it's not a movie I would ever watch again.

Yes Holmes was hung like a horse, and intact with a foreskin; but had a lot of difficulty getting and staying hard, and he later died of AIDS either from lots of unprotected sex with female and some male partners, or from IV drug use and sharing needles.

Only people who are extremely low-class would worship Dawn Schiller or Holmes.

cornholejoe

Jul 20, 2015, 7:56 PM

well what class are you

pole_smoker

Jul 20, 2015, 8:00 PM

well what class are you
We are not low class, we are quite comfortable to live in NYC.

69to77

Jul 20, 2015, 10:18 PM

Where is it proven that living comfortably equals class? Kanye West, Donald Trump, Bernard Madoff, Fidel Castro are examples of millionaires who are anything but classy. Socio-economic status has nothing to do with class.

pepperjack

Jul 20, 2015, 10:46 PM

pole_smoker

Jul 20, 2015, 11:48 PM

Who said anything about "class" or "worship?" I just said I thought it was an interesting story. But while we're there, I think the lady is a class act for rising above her past and having compassion for Holmes' widow.

Please, you do not even know what a class act is if you really think that woman is one. :rolleyes:

I know you are from flyover country where being highly uneducated like you are is common, and smoking meth is popular but that woman Schiller getting "legal guardianship" for Holmes' ex-wife has scam artist, grifter, and thief written all over it and anyone that is not naive or a total fool knows this. :rolleyes:

But I am not surprised you did not realize this and that you think she is a good person when she obviously is not, but where you areally from people really are ignorant, and very naive. :rolleyes: :smilies15

pepperjack

Jul 21, 2015, 12:12 AM

So far, half of the replies here have been the usual demeaning, hateful vomit spewed by ps. Is that any sort of indicator about what type of thread triggers his lunacy?:rolleyes:

pole_smoker

Jul 21, 2015, 3:32 AM

So far, half of the replies here have been the usual demeaning, hateful vomit spewed by ps. Is that any sort of indicator about what type of thread triggers his lunacy?:rolleyes:

My posts are not hate filled, demeaning, of any of the other bs you claim. :rolleyes:

I am however brutally honest, and know how to see people, and their motivations better than you do. ;) :smilies15

As for why nobody else has replied keep two things in mind: 1. This site is basically dead and was long before I started to post here. 2. This topic is very boring, and more of your usual bs hero/heroine worship about bottom feeders, which reflects you perfectly. ;)

charles-smythe

Jul 21, 2015, 12:57 PM

Who said anything about "class" or "worship?" I just said I thought it was an interesting story. But while we're there, I think the lady is a class act for rising above her past and having compassion for Holmes' widow. …just my opinion…yes…careing for holmes wife was a sign of class…money & clothes doesn’t equal class…take micheal for example…thanks to the tax payers money she has expensive clothes…but…she has about as much class as a basket of dirty laundry…

pepperjack

Jul 21, 2015, 1:14 PM

Who is Micheal, Charles?

pole_smoker

Jul 21, 2015, 1:20 PM

…just my opinion…yes…careing for holmes wife was a sign of class…money & clothes doesn’t equal class…take micheal for example…thanks to the tax payers money she has expensive clothes…but…she has about as much class as a basket of dirty laundry…

Dawn Schiller is not caring for Holmes' ex-wife. :rolleyes: Schiller just wants any sort of assets, property, or money that Holmes' wife has, and it's painfully obvious this is what her motivation is; but that should not surprise anyone since Schiller is literally a whore and crackhead junkie.

olmizzou42

Jul 23, 2015, 10:08 AM

Who said anything about "class" or "worship?" I just said I thought it was an interesting story. But while we're there, I think the lady is a class act for rising above her past and having compassion for Holmes' widow.

Agreed, Pepperjack! Her non-profit for teens and care for Holmes' widow overshadow what happened in the past. And, she was just an impressionable kid when all that happened.

pepperjack

Jul 23, 2015, 4:28 PM

The most recent development in the Bill Cosby scandal reveals an interesting parallel: http://ktla.com/2015/07/23/california-supreme-court-denies-bill-cosbys-petition-judith-huth-case-to-proceed-at-trial-level/

pole_smoker

Jul 23, 2015, 5:02 PM

Agreed, Pepperjack! Her non-profit for teens and care for Holmes' widow overshadow what happened in the past. And, she was just an impressionable kid when all that happened.

LMAO!!! You are really naive if you think Schiller does anything good with her silly non-profit, or that she actually cares about Holmes' widow. She simply uses her non-profit to promote her silly book, and it is obvious to anyone with a brain and intelligence that she is nothing but a scam artist, does not really care about Holmes' widow and only cares about how much money she'll inherit when Holmes' widow dies. :rolleyes:

Schiller is a whore, junkie, scam artist, and crackhead. She knew exactly what she was doing when she became Holmes' whore and side piece decades ago, and she has never stopped being a scam artist. Schiller and people like her are your typical dime a dozen low class bottom feeders who are professional victims and weak people who refuse to take any personal responsibility for their own actions.

void()

Aug 14, 2015, 11:18 PM

now she wants to become 'famous' because of this. :rolleyes:

She's also a scam artist, professional grifter-has been since she was 15 and still is, pathological liar, pretends to be a 'victim' when she knew fully well what she was doing decades ago, and is now Holmes' ex wife's legal guardian, which was a mistake on Sharon Holmes' part. :rolleyes:

Not worshiping either here. Will say though, to me it does not seem she is acting as a victim, rather as a survivor. On top of it she is helping unfortunate children. Good on her.

May not have been a really exciting or even glamorous article. That aside even mundane human fluff pieces if done well help readers in understanding human nature, Also did not seem to me she was seeking fame. She grew up, survived and is doing okay, helping others.

charles-smythe

Aug 15, 2015, 8:44 PM

Who is Micheal, Charles?obama

pepperjack

Aug 15, 2015, 8:51 PM

obama

Oh, ok, your personal code word ? :smilies15 You got the dirty laundry part right. ;)

void()

Aug 16, 2015, 1:02 AM

Not worshiping either here. Will say though, to me it does not seem she is acting as a victim, rather as a survivor. On top of it she is helping unfortunate children. Good on her.

May not have been a really exciting or even glamorous article. That aside even mundane human fluff pieces if done well help readers in understanding human nature, Also did not seem to me she was seeking fame. She grew up, survived and is doing okay, helping others.

But I am likely a naive, bottom feeding, fool according to some. So ...

Will agree though on something. The site was in decline before some posting. Then, visitors were asked to pay for chat that could, and up until then been provided here freely as well as a few other limited features.

Some visitors offered advice, to even help. The site continued in a push for money. Some visitors asked the obvious question.

"Why pay for what can be had freely?"

These visitors even showed how it could be done on the site, if not freely, at nominal cost.

No, that was not considered. Some visitors point blank left the site. Some visitors stayed around. Some that did stay do wonder why at times. They recall friends, intelligent, mature conversations, a healthy dose of silliness and good laughs as well. For some that hung around that remains. Others realize the site has long not been the same as it had been.

So the obvious question is asked again.

"What changed?"

pepperjack

Aug 16, 2015, 8:18 PM

So, Void.....given your above comments, why haven't you joined The Bisexuality Club by now, like so many others on here ?

void()

Aug 16, 2015, 9:05 PM

So, Void.....given your above comments, why haven't you joined The Bisexuality Club by now, like so many others on here ?

I was one of the ones pointing out, no need to pay for what can be free. Even offered a few suggestions regarding site hosting, forum hosting, chat. I faced a little difficulty in locating a micro-transaction service to accept adult sites. Drew did as well in facing the issue of credit card companies that would accept adult sites. It would be preferred if our forum maintained a G rating for the credit card service.

My argument is, chat, forums, web hosting, blogs are free elsewhere, why pay for it here? Some would argue it is in order to support the site. Drew as far as I recall runs at least three other commercial and for profit adult entertainment sites. I have indeed, in fact looked into how doing a site such as this would cost to establish, maintain and run. Yes, there is some expense. It is not as expensive as many would suggest though.

I first came here when this site was free without restrictions such as the fan club. Why now offer support in the form of financing? From what I gathered of it, Drew's partner took issue that this was a free site and not generating revenue. Also gathered it was Drew's site. That noted, why ought Drew need to pass on consequence of his personal life to users of his sit that he ran so long without profit? Simply, it did not make sense to me. Yes, I understand it is his site, not sure he does though and I'm not meaning that in any confrontational manner directed at him. His site, not his partner's.

Drew from my understanding did not mind offering a free site. This changed though and I think for some erroneous reasoning. Did not see point to support that. There are really are not enough features on offer to entice me into paying for fan club either. You can get extra private messages, supposedly access to chat. These can be worked around via checking messages as an unpaid user, offer email address and instant messaging info via a private message. Then you can message or email without needing the site altogether.

So, there you go.

pepperjack

Aug 16, 2015, 9:53 PM

void()

Aug 16, 2015, 11:39 PM

Well, whereas this site has somewhat descended into near anarchy, that one is evolving in the direction of totalitarianism. Not a good site for one who values freedom of expression.

I was the first member ( maybe the only one so far ) to leave.

Chat, an initial draw, is dead & boring, appearing to be monopolized by just a couple of members.

While somewhat stagnant at times, there's still more free-spirited interaction here.

So, there you go. :shades:

Well, that's when users step in. Create another free site without any dictators. Crowd funding may cover any nominal costs if need be, the site could also use a tip jar, or donations.

Users could elect a council of elders to help run the site. There's no need for dictators. Anarchy is not such a bad as an idea as many are inclined to think. People can volunteer help.

Of course, that is allowing that everyone treats others with respect. Still, the elders could moderate, see to it the site was moderated. Disrespectful users could be banned for a week to start, they get two weeks of banning in three months and more drastic measures could be enacted. Users can be blocked via IP, and once blocked not ever allowed to access the site again.

As I said all of this can be affected freely, or via nominal cost, and if donations were accepted there would be no need of subscriptions to some form of exclusivity. Like I said as well, not that I'm too concerned to be excluded from the fan club. There were not any real extras as far as I could see, which for me would warrant a subscription cost, especially not if it excludes others.

Not sure what other site you're talking about. I looked at one other started by a group from this site. Did not like the notion of exclusion there either, in that there excluded here and vice versa. This site, bisexual.com, was allegedly created in the spirit of inclusion. Going counter to that and now, having it exclusive may be part of its decline. I don't know nor will I try pretending to know.

I'm also sure I do not know everything about running a successful site for bisexual people. What I do know of creating sites, running them comes from observation, a little experience with kludge work here and there. I've seen that it could cost very little, if anything to do. Also seen such a site could cover its costs via donations if needed, or crowd funding. It doesn't take much to see these concepts, and see them functional, successful.

You asked why I hadn't joined. Well, exclusivity and not enough to entice me. That and I tend to live within a bit of a set budget for myself. Later on I may like to offer a bit for help money wise, or maybe not. It should be a volunteer choice, not one that foists exclusion on a site supposed to be about inclusion. Guess you know now.