Rule 3: Where is the line?

[tenni]

3 - Sexual freedom is what it's all about, but even it should have limits - discussions of non-consensual sex, violence and sex, or sex involving children are not welcome here, will be promptly deleted, and the poster may be banned.

There are a couple of threads on the site where discussions about sex as a child are being discussed. I wonder where is the line in co relationship with rule 3?

In one case the OP is asking about if bisexuals have had sex as children and if that played a part in their sexuality. In another case the OP reports how pleasureable it was to be a pre pubescent boy having sex and being seduced by a man more than three times as old as the boy. In another report, the poster discussing being 15 and having sex with a 22 yo man and his g/f.

For me, the story of a 15 yo young man having sex with a 22 yo is ok if perhaps a bit on the edge of being acceptable. Posting about being a juvenile and having non consensual sex and living with the after effects seems appropriate. I'm just not sure where the line should be in some of the other reports.

What is your opinion?

[Gearbox]

I'm admittedly hypocritical when it comes to underage sex with adults. When reading the tales about how some members were seduced by adults at a young age, all I can think of is how that would have been my dream cum true at that age, and how VERY lucky they were to find such adults!
BUT if it were those adults posting exactly the same thing about how they seduced someone underage, I'd be fekin disgusted with them and hope they'd get locked up for it!:confused:

[biblkman]

I think rule 3 is more of what your not suppose to say rather than a particular subject...like we all can discuss what it was like to be a victim of some nonconsensual sex or a victim of childhood sexual abuse, to get an understanding of self , sexual identity or work through some trama.

But it is not ok for a sick fuck to talk about how they like to rape or molest, there is no understanding or trama to work through just a sick fuck trying to get there jollys...and for a person to take pleasure and discuss there sick desires is too much of a wound and offense to people who have been victimized.

I think that's what's rule 3 really means.

I could be wrong

[babloobla]

I think the line is between victims and perpetrators. Victims may feel empowered or gain some healing through sharing their stories, and may empower other victims. Perps however are abusing their power,,, I'm some what with gearbox and biblkman on their opinioins. I found it helpful to privately, in writing explore the erotic feelings I felt from a childhood experience that was very confusing and messed my sex life up for decades. Fantasizing about the experience helped me feel power over the perp, some vengeful fantasizing helped too.. I would never condone or encourage such behavior from an adult.. I can only imagine the rage I would feel confronting a molester.

[jamieknyc]

Serious discussion of teen experiences is appropriate. Someone trying to meet underaged people, or perving on them, is beyond the line.

[darkeyes]

Serious discussion of teen experiences is appropriate. Someone trying to meet underaged people, or perving on them, is beyond the line...and serious discussion on ages of consent... since countries around the world have so many different arbitrary ages at which the young may become sexually active within the law.. anything from 12 (and some cultures even younger.. even pre-pubescent) to 21 and a few even have different ages of consent for boys and girls.. serious considered discussion is one thing Jamie, flippant discussion for the purposes of getting off is quite another I think u will agree.

[Brian]

It is hard to know where to draw the line, but my thoughts are as follows... As long as the nature of the post is such that it isn't for entertainment purposes, and thus contains little-to-no detail, then it is acceptable, because then its purpose is for honest education/discussion. If I get the impression that detail, or any other aspect of the comment, is trying to titillate, then it is unacceptable. That is my 2 cents and the criteria I have been using to date (subject to possible, occasional inconsistencies on my part).

Having said that, if a lot of comments were made describing underage sex, then I might tighten the criteria, because I wouldn't want this place to get a reputation among odd people as a haven for that kind of discussion (and thus legitimizing it by volume).

- Drew :paw:

:2cents:

[jamieknyc]

In the United States, it varies from one state to the next as well. In New York, the age of consent is 17.