tenni
Aug 24, 2012, 11:40 AM
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/naked-harry-unnerves-british-press/article4494676/
'The Sun newspaper’s decision to print nude pictures of Prince Harry against the wishes of the Royal Family sends a message that it will fight tougher media regulation in the wake of Britain’s phone-hacking scandal.
Thursday’s papers refrained from running the grainy snaps showing the third in line to the throne cavorting naked with friends in a Las Vegas hotel suite after royal officials contacted the Press Complaints Commission media watchdog...."
I don't think that any legitimate media (hard copy or internet) should publish nude pictures of anyone without their permission. I agree that this is salacious garbage. Here are some comments from Canucks on the Globe & Mail's comment section.
What say the Welsh, Scots, English, Canucks, Aussies, NZlanders and other Commonwealth peeps?
"Wow, a healthy 27 year old male got naked with a girl. That's never happened before!"
"I would like the media to post the name of the photographer who took those photos"
"The press was at least partly responsible for the death of Harry's mother. Unrestrained, the press are the lowest possible cretins."
"We have a new picture to put on the 100 dollar bill."
"Harry's not that hairy afterall."
"I don't care if he is a public figure, there are some things that are just plain private. If it's not illegal to publish those photos it should be.
He's not having an affair, he wasn't snorting or injecting anything illegal. Leave him alone."
'The Sun newspaper’s decision to print nude pictures of Prince Harry against the wishes of the Royal Family sends a message that it will fight tougher media regulation in the wake of Britain’s phone-hacking scandal.
Thursday’s papers refrained from running the grainy snaps showing the third in line to the throne cavorting naked with friends in a Las Vegas hotel suite after royal officials contacted the Press Complaints Commission media watchdog...."
I don't think that any legitimate media (hard copy or internet) should publish nude pictures of anyone without their permission. I agree that this is salacious garbage. Here are some comments from Canucks on the Globe & Mail's comment section.
What say the Welsh, Scots, English, Canucks, Aussies, NZlanders and other Commonwealth peeps?
"Wow, a healthy 27 year old male got naked with a girl. That's never happened before!"
"I would like the media to post the name of the photographer who took those photos"
"The press was at least partly responsible for the death of Harry's mother. Unrestrained, the press are the lowest possible cretins."
"We have a new picture to put on the 100 dollar bill."
"Harry's not that hairy afterall."
"I don't care if he is a public figure, there are some things that are just plain private. If it's not illegal to publish those photos it should be.
He's not having an affair, he wasn't snorting or injecting anything illegal. Leave him alone."