PDA

View Full Version : Disturbing announcement from WHO



DuckiesDarling
Apr 8, 2011, 4:33 PM
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2011/whd_20110407/en/index.html



When the first antibiotics were introduced in the 1940s, they were hailed as “wonder drugs”, the miracles of modern medicine. And rightly so. Widespread infections that killed many millions of people every year could now be cured. Major diseases, like syphilis, gonorrhoea, leprosy, and tuberculosis, lost much of their sting. The risk of death from something so common as strep throat or a child’s scratched knee virtually vanished.

The powerful impact of these medicines sparked a revolution in the discovery of new drugs. The human condition took a dramatic turn for the better, with significant jumps in life expectancy.

The message on this World Health Day is loud and clear. The world is on the brink of losing these miracle cures.

The emergence and spread of drug-resistant pathogens has accelerated. More and more essential medicines are failing. The therapeutic arsenal is shrinking. The speed with which these drugs are being lost far outpaces the development of replacement drugs. In fact, the R&D pipeline for new antimicrobials has practically run dry.

The implications are equally clear. In the absence of urgent corrective and protective actions, the world is heading towards a post-antibiotic era, in which many common infections will no longer have a cure and, once again, kill unabated. The implications go beyond a resurgence of deadly infections to threaten many other life-saving and life-prolonging interventions, like cancer treatments, sophisticated surgical operations, and organ transplantations. With hospitals now the hotbeds for highly-resistant pathogens, such procedures become hazardous.

While hospital “superbugs” make the biggest headlines, these especially deadly pathogens are just the extreme expression of a much broader, and more disturbing picture.

The development of resistance is a natural biological process that will occur, sooner or later, with every drug. The use of any antimicrobial for any infection, in any dose, and over any time period, forces microbes to either adapt or die in a phenomenon known as “selective pressure”. The microbes which adapt and survive carry genes for resistance, which can be passed on from one person to another and rapidly spread around the world.

This natural process has been vastly accelerated and amplified by a number of human practices, behaviours, and policy failures. Collectively, the world has failed to handle these fragile cures with appropriate care. We have assumed that miracle cures will last forever, with older drugs eventually failing only to be replaced by newer, better and more powerful ones. This is not at all the trend we are seeing.

Faulty practices and flawed assumptions have clearly made the inevitable development of drug resistance happen much sooner, rather than later. For some diseases, like malaria, our options are very limited as we have only a single class of effective drugs - artemisinin-based combination therapies - with which to treat more than 200 million falciparum cases each year. Although new drugs are under development, especially through the Medicines for Malaria Venture, a public-private partnership, early signals of artemisinin resistance have already been detected.

Similarly, gains in reducing child deaths due to diarrhoea and respiratory infections are at risk. And, while TB deaths are declining, in just the past year nearly half a million people developed multidrug-resistant TB, and a third of them died as a result. These are just a few of the stark warnings that must be heeded.

The responsibility for turning this situation around is entirely in our hands. Irrational and inappropriate use of antimicrobials is by far the biggest driver of drug resistance. This includes overuse, when drugs are dispensed too liberally, sometimes to “be on the safe side”, sometimes in response to patient demand, but often for doctors and pharmacists to make more money.

This includes underuse, especially when economic hardship encourages patients to stop treatment as soon as they feel better, rather than complete the treatment course needed to fully kill the pathogen. This includes misuse, when drugs are given for the wrong disease, usually in the absence of a diagnostic test.

In many countries, this includes a failure to keep substandard products off the market, to ensure that antimicrobials are dispensed only by a licensed prescriber, and to stop over-the-counter sales of individual pills.

And this includes the massive routine use of antimicrobials, to promote growth and for prophylaxis, in the industrialized production of food. In several parts of the world, more than 50% in tonnage of all antimicrobial production is used in food-producing animals. In addition, veterinarians in some countries earn at least 40% of their income from the sale of drugs, creating a strong disincentive to limit their use. The problem arises when drugs used for food production are medically important for human health, as evidence shows that pathogens that have developed resistance to drugs in animals can be transmitted to humans.

On this World Health Day, WHO is issuing a policy package to get everyone, especially governments and their drug regulatory systems, on the right track, with the right measures, quickly. Governments can make progress, working with health workers, pharmacists, civil society, patients, and industry. We all can plan and coordinate our response. We can expand surveillance efforts. We can improve drug regulatory and supply systems. We can foster improved use of medicines for human and animal health. We can actively prevent and control infections in health services and beyond. And, we must stimulate a robust pipeline for new antimicrobials, diagnostics and vaccines.

Drug resistance costs vast amounts of money, and affects vast numbers of lives. The trends are clear and ominous. No action today means no cure tomorrow. At a time of multiple calamities in the world, we cannot allow the loss of essential medicines – essential cures for many millions of people – to become the next global crisis.

Hephaestion
Apr 8, 2011, 7:52 PM
Those in the know have been battling to make this kind of information register; people continue to delude themselves that science will always come up with an answer.

.

Katja
Apr 9, 2011, 4:26 AM
We have known for many years that viruses evolve and mutate to become more resistant to our medicines. Infection is no different and ourover use of antibiotics is endangering our ability to combat so many serious and life threatening diseases many of which are mass killers.

It is not merely administering drugs to ourselves which threatens us, but the routine administration of antibiotics and other medicines to domesticated livestock which hampers our ability to keep pace with the mutation of so many viruses and germs. To date the nightmare scenario of a large scale pandemic which lays waste to humanity has been avoided but I question whether, by our overuse of medicines such as antibiotics, we can avoid this in the long term.

By more responsible and sparing use of our medicines in both human beings and in what we eat, we can make the scenario of a catastrophic pandemic less likely, in part by slowing down the mutation of disease, but also by giving pharmaceutical companies more time to develop and test properly new treatments thus adding to our armoury of defences.

void()
Apr 9, 2011, 4:57 AM
We need more botox treatments? Groovy, so we're gonna play wheel of fortune with deadly viruses and then complain? Hell yeah, count me in for that ride!

Dude, they make anthrax and Spanish Influenza (http://www.roangelo.net/schlectweg/influenz.html) up in Jersey along side Campbell's Soup. They even got a factory what produces all the flavors of everything up there. They've still not figured out what chicken (http://youtu.be/ZqBJkCkeHdE) tastes like, so it tastes like everything.

elian
Apr 9, 2011, 9:16 AM
Society itself is flawed, so its institutions are flawed as well.

I really DON'T need anti-microbial crap in every single product I buy but now it's just another marketing gimmick to sell more product. I mean, if the same people who religiously use those wipes and sprays knew how much bacteria was inside their bodies and just floating around the air in general they might get really paranoid. I recently read in the paper that some paediatric association of some kind recommended children 4' 9" and smaller need to use a booster seat when they ride in cars. WTF?! I know a 60 year old lady at work who is 5' tall...

Technology can be great, wonderful and useful but just like everything else it needs to be used in moderation. The other side of the coin is "Who gets to do the moderating?" We have AIDS treatments that would work to save lives in Africa right now but there are big patents on all of that stuff, not to mention racism and classism that play a part in deciding WHO gets access to the medication.

Hephaestion
Apr 9, 2011, 9:33 AM
....... the routine administration of antibiotics and other medicines to domesticated livestock ........

Trumpetted as 'growth promoters' a cost effective way of staying competitive in the market place.

lizard-lix
Apr 9, 2011, 9:46 AM
My wife is a Nurse Practitioner and Physicians Assistant.. She has been fighting this battle for probably 25 years... (ignorant) People have even threatened to sue her for not giving them antibiotics when they were not called for. And one of the biggest problems is that people stop their antibiotic treatments halfway through the course because they feel better and don't want to take the drugs anymore. This practice helps make the superbugs, big time...

Hephaestion
Apr 9, 2011, 3:48 PM
Don't forget reducing the dosage to make it last longer e.g. breaking the pills up or dilution, espeically in the third world (wait a minute that 's us in the the UK)

DuckiesDarling
Apr 9, 2011, 8:44 PM
What really got to me about the article is that while we have known this forever, no one is really taking it that serious. The idea of a world where minor infections can kill, even in modern countries, is scary. Will people take better care of themselves if they know there isn't a "miracle cure". Will the simple precaution of using condoms prevent venereal diseases that will no longer be dealt with by antibiotics but will ravage the body and in some cases the mind of the person infected?

But with the World Health Organization actually issuing this warning, maybe, just maybe, a few people will take heed. They will finish medicine as prescribed and they will understand when a doctor or nurse practitioner doesn't think an antibiotic is needed.

Taking anything for granted is always a big mistake, in this case it can be a deadly mistake.

Bluebiyou
Apr 10, 2011, 7:32 AM
About the only thing I can think of is that hospitals should be bio/geographically placed.
There should be mist-ers spraying rambunctious but non-threatening bacteria all around hospitals.
Microbiological competition should help limit 'superbug' numbers. Staph and strep abound in 'clean' hospitals. Spray some benign and nonthreatening bacteria to compete with these bad boys. Yeah, due partially to human behavior, the end of antibiotics' effectiveness is near certain.
But we can lengthen that period out by introduction of bacteria/molds that are benign which compete with standard and specialized variety.
We can also lengthen the term with... an old fashioned effective solution; quarantine. The effective way to stop leprosy was to send the patients to a leper's camp. But it's contradictory to our beliefs in freedom.
:2cents:

Darkside2009
Apr 10, 2011, 8:15 AM
The last leper colony in Europe was in Crete, on the small island of Spinalonga. It remained so until the 1950's, at which time the remaining people were transferred to a hospital in Athens for treatment.

The fact that people were detained there long after a cure was found is not to our credit, but Greece, then as now was a relatively poor country.

The people on Spinalonga had their own houses and shops and grew some of their own food, the rest was brought to them by boat by relatives. They even married and had children, but the children were removed from them.

A story is told there of a young woman who took food on the boat to her man on the island, the boatman noticed a strange burning smell. On investigation as to its cause, they found the young women's leg had been pressed against the exhaust pipe of the boat's engine. She had not felt any pain as unfortunately she too had contracted leprosy, and was sent to live on the island herself.

When the lepers died, they took the remains and dropped them into a large subterrainean cavern, then put the lid back on top. At one time it was a macabre attraction for people to look down into the cavern from above to see the human bones scattered beneath.

The ex-colony is now a tourist attraction, with boats to and from each day, so that people can wander its narrow lanes and remains of houses, and wonder in sadness, at how we treated our fellow human beings.