My husband and I feel bad for any guy who unfortunately had his genitals mutilated.
Circumcision could be based on religious beliefs and as a circumcised father of two circumcised sons. My penis was not mutilated by my parents and we didn't mutilate our sons. We also named our boys and made them live with us
Even if someone is religious or Jewish or Muslim that does not mean that they have to mutilate their sons' penises. Not all Jews or even Muslims mutilate their kids' genitals just because of the excuse of religion or to look like their father.
If a penis is circumcised then it's been mutilated, as children and infants cannot consent to having their genitals mutilated or not. Had they had the choice they would have said no to genital mutilation.
C'mon, roadhouse. Don't you know that pole_smoker is the ultimate authority on this subject? His is the only valid terminology. If he says 'mutilated', then mutilated it is. And he's most definitely correct in stating that NO ONE would choose circumcis --- I mean GENITAL MUTILATION -- if they were given the choice. Not even my nephew, who, as a young adult, had this done of his own volition following years of discomfort and infection as a result of his not being circum --- I mean, MUTILATED...
How many times does pole_smoker have to tell you?
Circumcision=involuntary genital mutilation.
Too bad mines cut. I love uncut cock, my favorite.
My husband was so for circumcision because he got it done as an infant until I started going over the scientific factors of it.
We are working on our last kid, I told him if we were to have a boy I would not be able to live with myself knowing I had allowed genital mutilation to occur on my child, or that they had scarred him for life and reduced his future enjoyment when he was older.
Just because it's a standard practice doesn't mean it should be done.
i have an uncut cock, and love it!!!
Bookmarks