Circumcision is genital mutilation and kills sexual pleasure dead.
Circumcision is genital mutilation and kills sexual pleasure dead.
If your not cut..you are not coming anywhere near me! My preference and this is the female half talking. Uncut is nasty and gross!!!!
This a less than nice statement.. it is one thing to say u prefer circumcised men, quite another to to say that men being uncircumcised is nasty and gross.. it is insulting for one thing and is a form of prejudice about which no one should feel pride and certainly should never "run off at the mouth" on line.. men are born with foreskins, and that is their natural form. We all prefer different things in the people with whom we have sex.. we are attracted to different aspects of their mind and body. U are attracted to men who have, in the main, been genitally mutilated without their consent by parents or guardians.. ur choice.. but I wouldnt shout your rejection of the uncircumcised too much from the roof tops in the manner u have done on this page.. it makes u sound very small, somewhat nasty and a tadge gross...Originally Posted by Mike and Pam
Do not think so little of me as to grant me your tolerance. Allow me your acceptance and understanding of who and what I am with the love, respect and dignity with which I do you.
Then the "female half" must find her own vagina to be gross, and disgusting, and the male half probably does as well but just doesn't tell her this so he won't be cut off from getting some pussy. A woman's vagina produces way more smegma than a man's foreskin does, produces yeast, and menstruates. Some women have large labia which men find gross, and nasty.
There are also a lot of men even bi and hetero men, who find the smell and taste of a woman's vagina to be disgusting and don't give women oral sex.
Last edited by pole_smoker; Nov 19, 2014 at 3:27 PM.
This whole conversation is just getting childish and stupid. "Ew, gross, disgusting!" What are we, 2 years old again?!!! Nothing wrong with a cut cock or a uncut cock. I have never sucked a uncut cock before, but that is not a preference, just not a opportunity I have had. I have never dated a black woman or black man either, but again, I just never had the opportunity. Personally, I would suck a man's cock even if he was cut or uncut, if he was white or black. Doesn't matter to me at all. All that matters is personal hygiene.
I have and found it no different than a cut , or as prevalent in this thread, mutilated cock. I also found the guy no more sensitive to touching than a uncut guy. I do feel that a cut cock is more appealing, to me, than an uncut one.
I've never had the opportunity to to suck a black cock yet either but I can't imagine the color to matter in any way.
Obviously you're not masturbating or sucking the intact man correctly.
As a man who is intact I've found that most men who are mutilated or cut simply don't know how to suck my dick or jerk me off correctly the way another intact man with a foreskin does. I've been with one guy that's cut for oral sex, and I masturbated a few. Cut/mutilated guys are less sensitive than guys who are intact as they don't have a foreskin, and a guy that's mutilated his cock is dry and has gross scars on it, and some are even more disfigured than that. I also have noticed that guys who are cut tend to blow their loads way too fast, and don't last nearly as long as guys who are intact easily can and do.
Try taking up the ass from a guy that's not cut. All the women and men I've been with who I fucked were amazed at how different and better a penis that's intact feels in their pussy or ass, compared to a cut one that's dry and rough.
Well obviously that must be it. Congrats on that amazing dick that you have by the way. It's clearly different than everyone else's.
Blowing your load too soon is because of lack of control. Anyone can learn to control their orgasmns, it just takes practice.
I've tried bottoming, it's just not something I enjoy. One guy was uncut, it didn't matter for me. I prefer to top anyway. My gross and rough, non sensitive cut cock seems please all of the asses that it's been in. Luckily for me, I must have got one of the good cut cocks.
Actually, yes a penis that's intact is drastically different than one that's cut/mutilated.
A penis that's intact has a foreskin that glides back and forth over the head which feels good both to the man who is left intact, and whatever woman or man he's fucking. It even feels better if the intact man is using a condom.
When it comes to sex and being a "top", there's more to it than just sticking your dick into a woman's pussy, or a man's ass and humping away.
There's an indisputable fact that circumcision removes about 12 square inches of highly erogenous tissue on a [male] adult. It's obvious, if they're missing tissue of the penile shaft, anyone with common sense would agree that they, and their sexual partners are feeling less pleasure, because they don't have the thousands of nerve endings that went with the tissue that was thrown away.
Plus, the foreskin has various functions including being a removable 'sleeve.' The sleeve slides up and down the penile shaft, reduces friction and stimulates the glands and the head of the penis and it makes it more comfortable and pleasurable for his sexual partner.
You can't remove parts of the penis without effecting sex, or sexual pleasure. Circumcision removes the most sensitive parts of the penis.
If a man is circumcised, he faces an increased risk of experiencing delayed orgasm, no orgasm at all, or he has to work hard to have an orgasm and ejaculate, and his female partner has an increased risk of not feeling sexually fulfilled.
This is the conclusion of a new Danish research article, which has received international attention.
The circumcised man develops a thin layer of hard skin on his penis head, which decreases the sensitivity. This means that in order to reach an orgasm, he needs to work harder at it, and that can lead to a painful experience for the woman.
When the penis enters the vagina, anus, or mouth, the foreskin is pulled back. And on its way out again, the foreskin goes back to cover the penis head. This way the foreskin stimulates both the man and the woman, or the man and another man.
The gliding in-and-out movement of the foreskin, combined with the in-and-out movement inside the vagina, anus, or mouth, constitutes what is known as ‘the gliding movement’.
When a circumcised man moves in and out of a woman or man without 'the gliding movement' caused by the foreskin, it can have a painful effect on the woman or man's mucous membrane. This could explain the pain and the tendency towards dryness that women and men with circumcised men experience.”
Circumcision or male genital mutilation also is to blame for why so many men in North America take drugs like Viagra or Cialis for ED as circumcision is linked to Erectile dysfunction. It's also a reason why a lot of women who are partnered to cut/mutilated men need to use those nasty synthetic lubes during vaginal sex.
Having sex with a cut/mutilated man is akin to having sex with a woman who has had parts of her vulva or clitoris mutilated as both female and male circumcision are just as bad as each other, and both are done for the exact same reasons.
Last edited by pole_smoker; Nov 20, 2014 at 1:15 AM.
IF you don't like what people write on your message boards then maybe you should not be posting! Its MY OPINION...I DONT LIKE UNCUT MEN!
[ QUOTE=pole_smoker;277234]Then the "female half" must find her own vagina to be gross, and disgusting, and the male half probably does as well but just doesn't tell her this so he won't be cut off from getting some pussy. A woman's vagina produces way more smegma than a man's foreskin does, produces yeast, and menstruates. Some women have large labia which men find gross, and nasty.
There are also a lot of men even bi and hetero men, who find the smell and taste of a woman's vagina to be disgusting and don't give women oral sex.[/QUOTE]
[/QUOTE]
Yes and we intact men don't want to have sex with you, or your husband either.
Circumcision is a major alteration of how people have and enjoy sex, a fact that is unknown among circumcising people, and that has come to be appreciated only in the past 30 odd years.
The harm of circumcision is not at all evident, unless one knows how to look for it. The adverse effects of circumcision on adult sex life vary a lot by individual, partner and stage of life. These adverse effects are often blamed on aging alone and includes Premature ejaculation, painful/uncomfortable sex for the woman or man being fucked, and Erectile dysfunction.
The parts cut off are the MOST innervated parts of the HUMAN MALE. When you cut the parts off you shut down a huge part of the kid’s/man’s sensory system. That can never be returned (it is shut down for good). Also, many cut men have sexual function issues from the start of sexual activity. However, most will get ED at a much younger age than they would otherwise or at all.
EVERY HUMAN (male and female) has the RIGHT (a human right) to reach adulthood with all of the tissue (particularly all of their erogenous tissue, and their genitals) that THEIR genetic code provides.
Baby boys are not born with diseased organs, or an intact penis that has a foreskin that must be mutilated. There is no medical indication for such a permanent mutilation. Many states have stopped wasting taxpayer dollars on this unnecessary mutilation.
The foreskin is an important part of male anatomy. The foreskin is erogenous tissue, containing thousands of erogenous fine-touch nerve endings. The most sensitive and pleasurable parts of the penis are removed by circumcision (this was proven by a study in 2007 by Sorrells which measured the sensitivity of 17 places on the male body part).
As for hygiene, circumcision is an extreme and irreversible solution to a trivial problem. Have you ever seen smegma? Have you ever seen an intact man clean himself in the shower? Smegma is far less of a problem than cut Americans make it out to be. For one thing, it washes away very easily. Women like the original poster who is all butthurt produce way more smegma, and even yeast, yet nobody is saying they should get their genitals mutilated even though some women are opting to do this by getting a labia plasty to get rid of huge roast beef curtains on their pussy.
Genital autonomy for all. Her body, her rights; his body, his rights. We wouldn't even think of removing anything down there from a baby girl--who have more folds of skin and issues down there than boys do over the course of a lifetime--so why do we even consider removing something down there from a baby boy?
Where male genital cutting is not customary, the lifetime risk of ever needing it is one in hundreds of thousands. Cutting healthy babies on the basis of such a chance is ridiculous.
Ever been with a gal who had to get a labiaplasty later in life because of discomfort?
Also, the female bits are more of a bacteria trap than a foreskin. Do you propose we excise little girls' or womens' flaps to create a less moist environment?
Fine, u dont like uncircumcised men.. ther was no need to b offensive about it.. u wudnt have far to go to get laid in this country exactly, but u would be more or less restricted to 2 communities wich make up about 5 or 6 % of the population 'tween them...outside of those, circumcised men are few and far between... not saying u r but u wud b in queer street if u wer a racist, and/or religious bigot... mind u since wen did that stop some peeps fucking wiv the inferior races, hey? Lucky ole u living in the US, hey? Difference 'tween u and I is I dont like males to be circumcised without their consent.. which, if I read u correctly, is something u would force upon ur own sons against their will simply because u dont like sex with uncircumcised men and think it gross and nasty..don't want the lickle boys thought of as gross and nasty now do we??
Wot I will say 2 ya is the sex with the uncircumcised is far lufflier and more satisfying than sex with the circumcised. Opinion but most women in this part of the world wud agree.. not all.. just most.... of those who prefer cut guys outside of cultural, racial or religious reasons, how much is down to the novelty of it I have no idea... but some at least is down to that.... it is different as has been pointed out if in a rather peculiar way.. always found it far easier to cum with the uncut because of how they fuck... clitoral contact is better and more firm.. more consistent.. it just feels nicer and I always found much less rushed... not to say much more filling. Not saying u have difficulty in cumming or getting sated with cut men... am saying u would most likely have less difficulty with the uncircumcised... but since they are nasty and gross that isnt gonna happen so ur not gonna find out r ya?
Finally, as to not posting because peeps write things I dont like, what is this forum for? A gud ole argy bargy and difference of opinion... I do like a gud ole argy bargy an' difference of opinion.... am a gr8 believer in freedom of speech.. even speech wich is offensive and unpleasant to most of the men around the world... God knos I've upset enuff of the poor buggers in me time.. but I do usually try, tho not always with complete success, not 2 b offensive... 'cept wen I was much younger... but then wen young, we r daft and dont care 'bout the feelings of others 2 the same extent do we? But we grow up most of us... and develop some degree of sensitivity..some peeps sadly neva do.. some just like to b obnoxious all ther lives, don't they Poley, hmmmm
Last edited by darkeyes; Nov 21, 2014 at 6:40 AM.
Do not think so little of me as to grant me your tolerance. Allow me your acceptance and understanding of who and what I am with the love, respect and dignity with which I do you.
True. Sex with a man that's intact who has a foreskin is a lot more lovely, and fun.Fine, u dont like uncircumcised men.. ther was no need to b offensive about it.. u wudnt have far to go to get laid in this country exactly, but u would be more or less restricted to 2 communities wich make up about 5 or 6 % of the population 'tween them...outside of those, circumcised men are few and far between... not saying u r but u wud b in queer street if u wer a racist, and/or religious bigot... mind u since wen did that stop some peeps fucking wiv the inferior races, hey? Lucky ole u living in the US, hey? Difference 'tween u and I is I dont like males to be circumcised without their consent.. which, if I read u correctly, is something u would force upon ur own sons against their will simply because u dont like sex with uncircumcised men and think it gross and nasty..don't want the lickle boys thought of as gross and nasty now do we??
Wot I will say 2 ya is the sex with the uncircumcised is far lufflier and more satisfying than sex with the circumcised. Opinion but most women in this part of the world wud agree.. not all.. just most.... of those who prefer cut guys outside of cultural, racial or religious reasons, how much is down to the novelty of it I have no idea... but some at least is down to that.... it is different as has been pointed out if in a rather peculiar way.. always found it far easier to cum with the uncut because of how they fuck... clitoral contact is better and more firm.. more consistent.. it just feels nicer and I always found much less rushed... not to say much more filling. Not saying u have difficulty in cumming or getting sated with cut men... am saying u would most likely have less difficulty with the uncircumcised... but since they are nasty and gross that isnt gonna happen so ur not gonna find out r ya?
Finally, as to not posting because peeps write things I dont like, what is this forum for? A gud ole argy bargy and difference of opinion... I do like a gud ole argy bargy an' difference of opinion.... am a gr8 believer in freedom of speech.. even speech wich is offensive and unpleasant to most of the men around the world... God knos I've upset enuff of the poor buggers in me time.. but I do usually try, tho not always with complete success, not 2 b offensive... 'cept wen I was much younger... but then wen young, we r daft and dont care 'bout the feelings of others 2 the same extent do we? But we grow up most of us... and develop some degree of sensitivity..some peeps sadly neva do.. some just like to b obnoxious all ther lives, don't they Poley, hmmmm
While sex with a cut guy is boring, and more "meh". I feel bad for cut men they had their genitals mutilated without their consent, and the majority of them would have, had they had the choice kept their penis intact and without scars, unmutilated, far more sensitive to them and their sexual partners (both male and female), and the way a penis is supposed to be or with a foreskin.
A cut cock is not mutilation. It's just a matter of opinion and preference.
Yes it is mutilation.
You're forcing genital mutilation onto someone who can't say yes, or no.
It's so painful that infants and young boys go into shock when the mutilation happens.
It also completely changes the penis making it far less sensitive, smaller in circumference and length than it would have been had the penis been left intact, it does nothing to make the penis "clean" or promote "hygiene" since there's such a thing as showering daily with soap and water, and the claims it prevents HIV/STD transmission are BS since if this were true you would not have had an entire generation or two of bi and gay men in the United States who were all cut get infected with HIV and die from AIDS or complications from HIV, and get infected with HIV.
Plus, there are things such as using condoms and having safer sex correctly that are far more effective at preventing HIV/STD transmission and infection than mutilating a man's penis is.
Each year a lot of infants die from having their genitals mutilated, and there's no actual need for anyone to get their genitals mutilated.
Either way, let them wait until they're an adult and then they can decide for themselves if they want their dick mutilated or not.
All the guys I know who are HIV+ or who have other STDs are cut. Guys who are intact keep their dicks clean. But guys who are cut for the most part don't, and think that because their dick is mutilated that there's no need for this. :rolleyes;
If you think that male circumcision or male genital mutilation is "a matter of opinion and preference" then you support female genital mutilation, and you should know that the women and men who promote FGM think of it as "A matter of opinion and preference".
Last edited by pole_smoker; Nov 21, 2014 at 9:54 PM.
The vast majority of circumcised males in Europe are post-WWII Moslem immigrants and their male descent. Circumcision is distasteful to many in Europe because it is perceived as Islamic, not as Jewish. Most European Jews are are intact, and not blinded by silly religious dogma that says they have to mutilate an infant boy's penis.
The winds of cultural change have turned against the forced circumcision of children solely at the request of parents, and the excuse of religion to mutilate someone's genitals. There is a growing revulsion directed at the notion that parents have the right to decide how a son and his eventual partners experience sex. The reason is that adults who are unhappy with their own circumcisions or that of their partners, are sharing their unhappiness via social media. This is one of the many ways in which social media are game changers. The frank talk about how the tip of the penis performs in masturbation, foreplay and penetrative sex have exploded the unspoken assumption that circumcision has no effect on sexual function and pleasure which is not true since circumcision or genital mutilation does change sex and the penis making the penis far less sensitive/thinner/smaller in length, and sex with a man that's intact with a foreskin is more pleasurable for women and men when they do sex acts like mutual masturbation, giving oral sex, or vaginal and anal sex. This change in the culture of human sexuality is a raw fact that even the most frum Jews will have to take on board, and Muslims too.
I feel bad for guys who are 'cut' or mutilated and their sex partners.
Being circumcised is neither a normal nor desirable condition. Circumcision is the amputation, and mutiltion of a functioning body part which Nature has provided to make sex more pleasurable and fun!
Yeah know, the rest of us circumsized guy's don't feel that it's that big of a deal. We still have sex and have great time doing it.
It's kind of like telling a guy with one eye how much better the color red would be if he had both eye's. He still see's red, it's all he's ever known and he still see it like everyone else.
Look around pole, we're all still having sex. According to the few of your somewhat useful poll's, we seem to be having more sex than you are too.
I don't feel bad and neither did anybody that I've had sex with. Not even one time has anyone ever said, gee that was great sex we had but it sure could have been better if you would have had foreskin.
I think you're overrating this much more that it really is. I understand that you're in love with your own penis, it shows in nearly every post you make. We all love ours too.
Pay no attention to that guy. He just has issues and then tries to project his issues on everybody else instead of being held accountable for his own actions. A cock is a cock and a pussy is a pussy. If it works then it's good. If you practice good hygiene then it's good. I've sucked cock before and eaten pussy and I enjoyed both.
This jerkoff is probably jerking off to the attention he's getting and from everybody revealing their sexual experiences probably because he is too ugly to get any so he makes up lies about his male partner and his make believe sex life.
Actually it's okay, everyone has a right to their opinion. Even when he say's I'm wrong or he doesn't believe what I post is true. I don't believe everything he posts either. I just don't think he has the wonder cock that he thinks he has but that's okay too. I think mines pretty cool too and so do other people.
If my cock was as spectacular as pole's apparently is, I'd be using a lot more than he does though.
Notice: Even though pole_smoker arrogantly say's a few things that aren't very popular, I've not once said anything that was meant to purposely be harsh about him. He does seem to be a bit voyeuristic but this is a sex site after all.
Very true, everybody does have a right to their own opinion, no matter how unpopular it might be. I should know from experience a few months ago when I was bad mouthing people on this site for being married and not being truthful with their bisexuality with their wife and then going out cheating. I can imagine that I was very unpopular with a lot of people who have been on this site for years. I was on this site several years ago, but I left. But one thing I must respectfully disagree with you. This site may seem to be perceived as a sex site, but I'm sure that there are those that might disagree with you. This site could be mistaken for a sex site because of perverts like pole_smoker, who posts a ridiculous amount of his polls for his own amusement. A lot of people are sick and tired of these sex polls because it clutters up the Threads with useless crap when people out there have real topics to discuss.
At first, I thought there was no harm to his sex polls but then it got personal when he started getting too personal with my sex life. When I told him that it was none of his business, he decided to push more and make his own accusations about my sex life when I decided not to "feed" his perverted desires. I will bad mouth that piece of shit, punk muthafucker until the day he leaves this site. He is nothing but a plague and a parasite.
Back to this not being a sex site as some people might perceive it to be. I see as a community for bisexual men and women to come to this site and talk about their issues. Or it's for the people that find out that their lover, who turns out to be bisexual, and come to this site to seek answers from people that are willing to help out. No, I see this as a community for bisexual people, but yes there are times when people come here looking for sex.
I meant that this was a place to talk about sex not that it was a place to hook up. Though it is possible to PM people to meet up and I've had some request's but the distance was too great. It seems though a lot of issues have already been discussed, so it's more of a search and read place instead
I hate those polls too and wish they in a question format and something that pole_smoker was actually wanting to know and not things for him to jerk off to.
On a positive note, site activity is actually increasing. Even if a portion is discussing displeasure of the childish like polls. A lot of it is not.
Stop getting all butthurt just because your dick is mutilated.
Granted you do have a reason to be angry at your parents and whatever quack of a nurse or doctor mutilated your dick but unless you do foreskin restoration you'll only keep decreasing your limited sensitivity, and develop premature ejaculation and erectile dysfunction because of your mutilated genitals. Foreskin restoration is not going to actually give you an unmutilated penis like an intact penis; but it's a start at regaining some sensitivity in your mutilated penis.
Yes it is true that guys who are mutilated don't know what they're missing. The way you assume or want to make it into a contest that "cut guys have more sex" because of what you see simply on this site is laughable. Try spending time in the real world, and travel outside of the United States, and see different cultures besides one where most men get their dicks mutilated and don't know any difference.
No they don't say that after sex with a cut guy; but they certainly do think it and just don't tell you how they wished that you were intact and not mutilated. Fortunately not all cut/mutilated guys and their partners are as ignorant as some people here are. Less and less people, including guys who are cut/mutilated are choosing to mutilate the genitals of their children and this is a good thing.
This site and the gay male hookup sites you go to do not represent the real world where the majority of men are intact, and their sexual partners both male and female love that they're intact with a foreskin and not mutilated.
Actually, if you had not noticed myself and other people here who are against male genital mutilation or circumcision simply want genital integrity for everyone both women and men, boys and girls since nobody should have their genitals involuntarily mutilated as this completely changes their sexuality, and the way their future partners experience sex with them.
I actually do have a wonderful sex life but it only includes having frequent sex with my partner and not other people. Unlike some people here we are monogamous and do not lie or cheat on each other.
Last edited by pole_smoker; Nov 24, 2014 at 3:40 AM.
I'm not hurt in anyway since I have pretty tough skin. Maybe it's circumsision taking over my entire body.
I'm more bored of your insistent need to menipulate my words to satisfy your own agenda. You don't know me don't know the guy's I have sex with.
I seem to be about the only one here that will even respond to you anymore but I'm about and RCH from acting upon the PM's that I've been receiving and block you too. Not because I'm offended but because of the pile of polls that that you are dumping on here. There are 136 of them that nobody has responded to.
Who gives a fuck, right Isitfun? I'm circumcised and so is my son too. Who gives a fuck if a dick is circumcised or uncut? Just some people making a big deal out of nothing. My cock is beautiful and cut and if someone said it was mutilated then that's their problem. They can always kiss my ass instead, or better yet my hole!
(Just because I might be a bottom to men, I ain't passive. If someone tried to rape me, I would break their dick off in my ass, pole_smoker!)
Your dick is not beautiful. It's mutilated, and has nasty looking scars and other deformities as that's what happens with circumcision to both women and men.
Most circumcised women, too, are happy with how they are, and will claim that their vulvas are "beautiful" and not mutilated but this is again denial just like cut men have about their cocks.
I'm not into rimming as it's disgusting, and if you are a bottom yeah you are passive as that's what the term means. No your ass is not that tight.
There should be no “debate” on genital cutting or genital mutilation. It all is a violation of human rights and needs to be protected against with legislation and enforcement. There should be no legal amount of oppression one can withstand at the hands of others, or encouraged. It's also very fucked up when a guy gets his own genitals mutilated and then does the same thing to his son. But women who have been 'cut' or who have their genitals mutilated do the same thing to their daughters, and sons.
I truly don’t understand how anyone could defense genital mutilation of infants in any way. There might be studies on each side, but reality shows that there are no valid health benefits: The majority of Europeans including Jewish people do not mutilate infants after birth and they have less UTI’s, less infections, less penile cancer rates, less infant deaths and less STD’s than cutting eager USA.
On the contrary, circumcised men are more prone to STD’s because they are less likely to use condoms: either due to the lack of feeling or because they are fooled to think they are safe now!
Circumcision has been linked with premature ejaculation, and erectile dysfunction.
I've been with guys who are cut and they all came very fast; but the guys I was with who were not cut had control over when they wanted to orgasm/ejaculate, and did not have PE.
Dicks that are cut look gross and odd to me since they don't have a foreskin and have a scar and other deformities on them. It's akin to being with a woman who has had her vulva and clit mutilated.
Why Most Circumcised Men Seem Satisfied
Circumcised men do not know what they are missing.
Why don't we hear a lot more from circumcised men about how they truly feel about being circumcised? Here are the possible reasons.
Circumcised men do not know what they are missing. They believe that the sexual sensitivity they have without a foreskin is "normal." (Similarly, a woman born in Somalia who had been subjected to a severe form of female circumcision insisted that it had no impact. "It's the same thing. There is nothing different about my sexuality.") According to one man who was circumcised as an adult, sex without a foreskin is like sight without color. Those who have not seen in color cannot appreciate what is lost. See Men Circumcised as Adults.
Young circumcised men may not notice the negative sexual effects of circumcision until they are older, because of the progressive desensitization of the exposed glans (head of the penis) from exposure and rubbing against clothes. See Functions of the Foreskin. It is possible that circumcision is an unrecognized factor in the high rates of impotence in older American men.
Accepting circumcision beliefs and cultural assumptions prevents men from recognizing and feeling their dissatisfaction. A typical response is “When I was young I was told it was necessary for health reasons. I guess I just didn’t question that. I assumed that was so.”
The emotions connected with circumcision that may surface are very painful. Repressing them protects men from this pain. A circumcised man recalled, “It was something I just didn’t examine. I put it away in the back of my mind like a lot of guys do.” If the feelings do become conscious, they can still be suppressed. After learning about circumcision, another man said, “I don’t want to be angry about this.”
Those who have feelings about their circumcision are generally afraid to express them because their feelings may be dismissed or ridiculed. When asked why he had not revealed his circumcision feelings before, one man said, “I would be looked upon as strange or else people would toss it off lightly.” Another said, “It’s not something that anyone talks about. If it is talked about, it’s in a snickering, comical way which I find disturbing. People laugh about it as if there is something funny going on.”
Verbal expression of feelings requires conscious awareness. Because early traumas are generally unconscious, associated feelings are expressed nonverbally through behavioral, emotional, and physiological forms. Attitudes about people, life, and the future may also be affected. An example of an attitude resulting from childhood trauma is “You can’t count on anything or anyone to protect you.”
http://www.circumcision.org/satisfied.htm
I think this is a very subjective discussion... there is no right or wrong answer as to how each individual feel.
I was circumcised when I was 21 yrs old, on my own free choice. There are differences between before and after circumcision, less sensitive glans to name one.
If I could go back in time, would I change my decision? Hell NO!
Just like Yin and Yang, there are two sides to each coin. There are good and bad things about everything.
Arguing, complaining, debating etc will not change anything.
This is the great thing about the freedom of speech, where everyone has the right to his/her opinion.
So true Look4one. It is highly subjective. I just wish the decision to do it to children was held off until they can make the decision for themselves. Adults can make up their own minds. Some may say why not do it when they are younger so they won't feel the pain, well they do feel the pain since no matter if they apply a local, they cannot desensitize the entire area as an infant.
As Pole Smoker stated, you don't know what you are missing until you lose it. If you lost it as a baby, you would never really know. I can say as one who has restored his foreskin that I am glad I did restore. The sensitivity I have regained helps me to understand why it is so vital a part of male anatomy. With that said I am definitely against circumcision unless absolutely necessary. But for those who are fine with theirs cut, I have no problems with it, it is their choice like mine is as well
Pole_smoker needs help because he is a fucktard with mental issues. I really don't give a fuck what he says on here, I'm too busy laughing at his dumbass. I think it's funny getting him all riled up about stupid meaningless issues. I really don't pay attention to what he says. He is beneath me.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks