Being circumcised is neither a normal nor desirable condition. Circumcision is the amputation of a functioning body part which Nature has provided to make sex more pleasurable and fun!
Being circumcised is neither a normal nor desirable condition. Circumcision is the amputation of a functioning body part which Nature has provided to make sex more pleasurable and fun!
This is very common. Besides having mutilated genitals, a lot of men who are cut have had their genitals even further mutilated like yours were.Originally Posted by Long Duck Dong
I agree with your post. The majority of women and men in the world prefer a dick that's intact and unmutilated.
I have been around guys who are cut who did not practice hygiene or who thought because they are cut/mutilated that they didn't need to wash their dick and their penises smelled disgusting.
http://globalnews.ca/news/1606596/ac...-circumcision/
“I think circumcision is genital mutilation,” Cumming said, in an interview withdot429. “There is a reason you have foreskin.”
The Tony Award-winning Cabaret star said he was surprised to discover how much more prevalent circumcision is in North America than in Europe.
“It was only when I came to America that I realized what a common practice circumcision is. I’d show my penis to people, and they’d go, ‘Oh my God! What’s that?’ They were so amazed and utterly unused to and unexposed to the natural body of a man,” Cumming, 49, recalled.
“I thought that was a shocking thing. I was gobsmacked by that.”
Cumming, who stars as Eli Gold on The Good Wife, has just published a memoir entitled Not My Father’s Son.
A self-described “intactivist,” he said it doesn’t make sense to remove foreskin.
“I mean, you lose sensation there if you’re circumcised,” he said. “From my point of view as a sexual and sensual person, the idea that you would hack away at that and lose sensitivity and nerve endings on the most pleasurable and sensitive part of your body is terrible.”
Even more and more Jews are rejecting male genital mutilation.
http://www.haaretz.com/mobile/.premi...67B74EF7FBEBF2
Is this the generation that rejects circumcision?
There is no Jewish death penalty. There are no rabbinic executioners, or people who amputate limbs for violations of Jewish law. Ritual circumcision is the only act of physical harm that remains.
by other rabbis and relatives as he holds a boy at his circumcision. / Photo by APBy Avraham Burg
Published 03:50 30.08.14
A debate has come into being quietly here about the place of Brit Milah (the ritual circumcision of Jewish baby boys on the eighth day after birth). The debate is not taking place abroad, not in “anti-Semitic” Germany, but here in the State of Israel. When one mother refused to have her son circumcised, the rabbinical court tried to force her to do so, and the High Court of Justice countered the rabbis in the name of liberty.
This topic, which vanished when the fighting in Gaza broke out, could have toppled governments at other times. I think the issue runs much deeper than a legal battle.
On the day that my fourth grandson was circumcised, I wondered whether the institution of circumcision would be the next one to fall. Observance of the Sabbath, kashrut (Jewish dietary laws), mikveh (family purity laws), and the religious prohibitions against same-sex relations have not been obligatory social conventions for quite some time. They became the preserve, and means of preservation, of a diminishing minority. Will the same processes cause circumcision to follow suit?
Something about the institution of ritual circumcision is no longer all that convincing for young parents of this generation. In my family, all the males were always circumcised, without exception. My parents never thought about it. My own heart was pained at my sons’ circumcision, though it was no more than a young father’s heartache over the pain of his newborn baby. The discourse is different among my children. “Maybe we won’t do it. What for, anyway?” they have asked themselves four times already. The first time we talked about it, I realized that many of their friends had the same questions. Although they did it in the end, their questions are still real and require thought.
I approached the topic with a great deal of curiosity, and conducted a kind of man-in-the-street poll for several weeks. I asked my questions with care and got detailed responses. The many answers I received all pointed in a single direction: that the institution of circumcision is coming to an end. Or, to be more precise, the institution of circumcision has no real hold among the segment of the Israeli population that is not conservative and religiously observant.
On what basis do I make these statements? Let us begin with the explanations that people give themselves and that were given to me. “It’s healthy.” “It’s hygienic.” “It’s aesthetic.” “Half of American Christian men are circumcised.” “So the kid won’t stand out.” “So he won’t be embarrassed in the shower, at the pool, on the annual school trip, in the army.”
My innocent question, “Is any one of these answers sufficient reason to maim a child?” was met with silence. I asked, “Would you take out a child’s appendix soon after birth? Or implant a pacemaker in his body in order to play it safe?” The answer, with an embarrassed smile, was, “Oh, I never thought about it that way.” Nobody, but nobody, cited religious obligation as justification for the act.
But the only reason to harm a defenseless child in that way is the religious reason: the covenant between God and the Jewish people. Besides all the difficult restrictions I mentioned above (the Sabbath, dietary laws and the Jewish family that does not contain only Jews or only heterogeneous relationships) that are violated in public, we would do well to take note of the common thread that underlies many of these nullified commandments, whose examples include an eye for an eye, the Jewish death penalty, the sorcerous ordeal whose purpose was the public humiliation of a woman suspected of adultery. They are all concerned with the physical aspect of the religious conventions.
Generations of Jews have lived since those ancient commandments were almost completely abolished. Here are the facts: there is no Jewish death penalty. We do not put out eyes or cut off hands. There are no rabbinic executioners, or people who amputate limbs for violations of Jewish law. All that are left are the mohalim – those who are specially trained to perform circumcisions.
Ritual circumcision is the only act of physical harm that remains. For how much longer?
The acts of physical harm I enumerated above, and many others, fell into disuse as the social and cultural conditions in which the Jews lived changed. Is our generation the one that is ripe for the abolition of ritual circumcision?
A challenging opponent has arisen against the ancient rite of circumcision: the concept of rights. Recent generations have deepened and broadened the discourse of rights – the rights of a human being to his body and dignity.
Rights and liberties are the true strength of Western society. This is a society that fights with all its might against female genital mutilation, which is customary in other parts of the world and still widespread among immigrants who refuse to assimilate and internalize the values of the new world to which they moved.
The fight against female genital mutilation is highly complex; the woman’s right to do as she pleases with her own body, her right to enjoy sexual relations at least as much as her male partner does, the freeing of the woman from any form of ownership by men (such as her father, brother, husband or pimp).
The way the fight against female genital mutilation radiates to the struggle against male circumcision is well known and extremely significant. After all, what exactly is the difference between them?
The difference is that male circumcision has positive branding compared with female genital mutilation, even though the issues are no different. On the one hand is the parents’ right to raise their children according to their faith. On the other is children’s inborn rights over their own bodies. On the strength of that right, violence against children was prohibited, and corporal punishment at home and in school utterly condemned.
It is likely that many people will continue circumcising their sons for religious or behavioral reasons, and many will look for other ways to express their membership in the Jewish collective without compromising on universal principles, which include the child’s right to an intact body.
Let us conclude with a paradox. An important part of the religious argument against abortion is the fetus’ right to life. According to this argument, the fetus is a living creature in every way. And, they claim, every child – inside or outside the womb – has the right to be born and to live.
So if the fetus, which is connected to the placenta, already has rights within the womb and may not be harmed for religious reasons, how is it possible to harm him, for religious reasons, from the moment he is born?
Circumcision destroys sexuality and sexual pleasure in both men, and women.
I am a bisexual female
I like both cut and uncut. Doesn't bother me either way.
Male... er biologically...
Cock. give me cut or uncut cock.
I'm cut.
I am a male who was cut as a baby. Since discovering my Bi sexual side I have had cut and uncut cocks and frankly, I love cock, so it doesn't matter one way or the other to me. I've had white cut and uncut, black cut and uncut, Latino cut and uncut, and an Asian uncut, and a Pakistani cut. Never had any issues with either. Always were clean cocks. But I will say I find a hairless uncut cock to be very sexy, then again, I like bald cock way more then a big bush. Same with pussy.
I agree with pumper.... ANY cock is good cock.
ANY COCK L DO
A penis that's intact with a foreskin is far superior to one that's mutilated or "cut", since you can do more with a dick that's intact and has foreskin than with one that's mutilated and "cut". Plus men who are intact with a foreskin and their male and female partners get more sexual pleasure than mutilated "cut" guys and their unfortunate sex partners do.
True. A dick that's cut is mutilated.
Circumcision is a major alteration of how people have and enjoy sex, a fact that is unknown among circumcising people, and that has come to be appreciated only in the past 30 odd years.
The harm of circumcision is not at all evident, unless one knows how to look for it. The adverse effects of circumcision on adult sex life vary a lot by individual, partner and stage of life. These adverse effects are often blamed on aging alone and includes Premature ejaculation, painful/uncomfortable sex for the woman or man being fucked, and Erectile dysfunction.
The parts cut off are the MOST innervated parts of the HUMAN MALE. When you cut the parts off you shut down a huge part of the kid’s/man’s sensory system. That can never be returned (it is shut down for good). Also, many cut men have sexual function issues from the start of sexual activity. However, most will get ED at a much younger age than they would otherwise or at all.
EVERY HUMAN (male and female) has the RIGHT (a human right) to reach adulthood with all of the tissue (particularly all of their erogenous tissue, and their genitals) that THEIR genetic code provides.
Baby boys are not born with diseased organs, or an intact penis that has a foreskin that must be mutilated. There is no medical indication for such a permanent mutilation. Many states have stopped wasting taxpayer dollars on this unnecessary mutilation.
The foreskin is an important part of male anatomy. The foreskin is erogenous tissue, containing thousands of erogenous fine-touch nerve endings. The most sensitive and pleasurable parts of the penis are removed by circumcision (this was proven by a study in 2007 by Sorrells which measured the sensitivity of 17 places on the male body part).
As for hygiene, circumcision is an extreme and irreversible solution to a trivial problem. Have you ever seen smegma? Have you ever seen an intact man clean himself in the shower? Smegma is far less of a problem than cut Americans make it out to be. For one thing, it washes away very easily. Women like the original poster who is all butthurt produce way more smegma, and even yeast, yet nobody is saying they should get their genitals mutilated even though some women are opting to do this by getting a labia plasty to get rid of huge roast beef curtains on their pussy.
Genital autonomy for all. Her body, her rights; his body, his rights. We wouldn't even think of removing anything down there from a baby girl--who have more folds of skin and issues down there than boys do over the course of a lifetime--so why do we even consider removing something down there from a baby boy?
Where male genital cutting is not customary, the lifetime risk of ever needing it is one in hundreds of thousands. Cutting healthy babies on the basis of such a chance is ridiculous.
Ever been with a gal who had to get a labiaplasty later in life because of discomfort?
Also, the female bits are more of a bacteria trap than a foreskin. Do the people who are for male genital mutilation, propose we excise little girls' or womens' flaps to create a less moist environment?
Well said. Guys who are cut are mutilated, have desensitized penises, have smaller/less thick dicks than if their penises had not been mutilated, and a far less satisfactory sex life than men who are intact and their male and female partners do.The other thing is appearance... I like a cock...to look like a cock.???
Interesting comment but here's a thought:
Uncut cut erect looks like a cut cock...erect!
Here's another thought:
I suppose evolution has it all wrong... the skin shouldn't be there protecting the most sensitive part of a mans body.
I guess that makes eyelids unnecessay too!
It should not be surprising to anyone that the United States had a very high rate of circumcision or male genital mutilation, and yet a lot of cut men here take Viagra and other ED drugs, and cut guys think that those nasty synthetic lubes like astroglide, KY, eros, etc. actually feel good.
Circumcision or male genital mutilation ruins masturbation/the handjob, receptive oral sex, and anal and vaginal sex.
American gay and bisexual men, especially on both the East and West Coast, have been warm friends of the beleaguered American foreskin. Many/most North American gay and bi men are qualified to have an opinion here, because they have been intimate with both kinds of men.
A sign or our times is women helping carry signs reading "Foreskin Pride" and "Foreskin Is Fabulous" at Pride events all over North America. Some of these women are married mothers. I have seen on the internet a woman at SF Pride, with her baby boy on one arm, using her other arm to hold a sign reading "Circumcision Ruined the Handjob".
It is very revealing to read what North American straight women who've been intimate with both kinds of men, say in social media. The moving foreskin facilitates foreplay and handjobs. Young men usually don't need foreplay, but older men sometimes do. The foreskin catches and distributes pre-ejaculate in an optimal way. Many sophisticated women have noted the greater sensitivity of intact men, and the way the moving foreskin makes vaginal, anal, and oral sex less brutal and more loving. Women have commented on how circumcision does exacerbate PE, ED, and vaginismus.
1) Male
2) I am a 8" uncut and I know that a uncut guy MUST pull back the skin and keep it washed or it will be nasty. I love playing with and stroking on a uncut dick but will not make a differents just as long as the guy is fresh
i am a cut male. i prefer cut 1st, also like loose skin on an uncut.
1) Male
2) I ONLY get intimate with CUT cock. Uncut just doesn't look right to me.
3) Yes........I am very much cut.
1) Male
2) I prefer cut cock. I think many times we are comfortable with what we are....but if it's really clean....a nice cock.....is a nice cock....
3) I am cut.
Male here.
Uncut
Prefer Uncut.
I'm a bisexual male and cut. I have never met a man that had a uncut cock. I would be curious to suck a uncut cock.
I'm surprised that pole_smoker hasn't replied to this Thread yet.
Yea Jared, I'm with you, Ive never sucked an uncut before and hope to before I check out.
boats
Both my partner and I are intact, have foreskin, and prefer a penis and man that's intact as there's more you can do sexually and men who have a foreskin get pleasure in ways that guys who are cut can't and don't get since they have less nerve endings and no foreskin. Having sex with a cut guy is akin to having sex with a woman who has had a female circumcision.
I hope I never meet up with your ignorant self.Male...perfer cut...and I am cut myself. Two things bother me about uncut guys....first the being clean.....doesn't matter if they showered a half hour before...the minute you roll back that skin.. you got that skunky smell. The other thing is appearance... I like a cock...to look like a cock....not like a corndog...without the stick
I wish we could meet. I'm uncut and enjoy sucking both, there's just an extra turnon with uncut cocks.
Bi male cut.
I prefer cut, never had uncut
Odd American tradition. I don't think people should be making such decisions for others.
Female.First (1) Are you male or female ?
Uncut.Second (2) Do you like cut or Uncut
Erm... not male but, uncut... for now. ;-)Note: (if you are male are you cut or uncut)
I am uncut
i NEVER play without being absolutely fanatical about cleanliness and I am sure to always shower before my boi comes over. Only once, when he showed up unannounced, did he ask to suck me where I had been working all day and had not showered. I told him that I needed to go and cleanup and he said to give it to him anyways. I'm sure that there was some smell from sweat and urine but he seemed to relish it and gave me a fantastic blow job. That was for me uncomfortable at first but he got right into it and it was great!
I am always sure, before playtime to wash myself and especially my ass really well. Nothing turns me off more than going to rim a boi and that funky smell being present. I know that a lot of guys ( and girls ) don't mind it, but sorry - it's just gotta be clean and fresh. I've had my boi wash my ass for me and do a sniff check, just to remind him of his position in our relationship and he seems to like doing that.
I recently had a new convert here and he asked to shower together before we got to playing and I was pleasantly surprised when he was washing my back for him to kneel and I felt first one and then two well soaped finger entering my ass. He cleaned me out as deep as he could reach and I have to admit that it was an experience that we will relive when he is here again in a week.
I am uncut but with frequent use the head is usually exposed.
I find cut cocks sexy, recently had my first session with a guy who was cut but kept his frenulum. It was the best ever, great to suck.
Look forward to more!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks