Male, cut, love an uncut cock both to suck and to have fuck me. It just feels better!
Printable View
Male, cut, love an uncut cock both to suck and to have fuck me. It just feels better!
I'm male, and prefer my fellow males to be intact. Cocks with their foreskins are more aesthetically pleasing and function better than a circumcised cock. I've never had a problem with an intact guy smelling down there, and if you're so worried about diseases, then use a freaking condom.
I wish I had a foreskin.
i like'em cut and smooth, just like me. :)
I'm female, and most of the men I have been with have been cut, so it's more a familiarity than a preference. I don't believe that circumcision is appropriate (unless there's a specific medical reason), but I find a cut cock just as aesthetically appealing as an uncut one.
Im Uncut, and prefer uncut but don't really mind either way necessarily.
Mine is very tight and am thinking about circumcision but while I can still keep it clean I won't get it cut.
Hi all, as an uncut guy, for me anyways, having sex with a guy who has been cut is like having sex with a woman with one tit.There just seems to be something missing.
BicurNS, You really have a way with words don't you. Just be glad you still got the foreskin. 99% of us had no say in the removal, and God bless the ladies with only one tit it has to be hell for them to have had breast cancer and than removal. Keep up the good work of opening mouth and inserting your foot.Boats
Cut dick to me is boring. It's all scarred up, less sensitive, and discolored. I feel bad for men who are cut they don't have a foreskin. Their penises are a lot less sensitive than a man who is intact with a foreskin. I have been with guys who are cut who had totally desensitized dry dicks since they were cut. Not to mention the health issues from being cut like premature ejaculation, ED/impotency, and circumcision decreases penis length and circumference.
A) Male
B) Cut
C) Cut
It's been my experience that the uncut cocks I've sucked on smell like "old, dry urine". Nothing gets my face out of a crotch faster than that smell. I'm VERY hygienic and expect the same.
I've not been with a man and therefore have no real preference, but to the above poster -- it definitely sounds like you need to be much much much more selective when choosing your partners. I am quite positive that even after hiking for 3 or 4 days in the mountains, my cock does not smell like "old dry urine" or anything else nasty for that matter, because I choose to keep clean.
Male I only like cut. I'm 6" cut and shaved
Same here. I have however been around cut men who were naked who had nasty smelling cocks like that guy described, and that's because they did not know how to wash their penis with soap and water. The concept that a cut dick is somehow "clean" while a penis that has a foreskin is "dirty" is a myth. Men who are cut can and do have gross smelling dicks if they don't bathe or shower or clean their genitals with soap.
Male
Cut
prefer cut
Me im cut and have allways prferred cut guys
Cut, but then again at the time they didn't exactly ask me my preference, like most men of my generation parents decided to cut or not and since most people back then were religious and the Bible spoke highly of circumcision the deed was done.
Hey! WTF?!? When a guy SAYS he's "clean", I believe him. It's only when I put my face in his crotch that I discover one of two things; A) he smells freshly showered or, B) smells like someone microwaved a baby diaper ... and it's mostly the uncut guys.Quote:
Originally Posted by uhuhuncut http://www.bisexual.com/forum/images...post-right.png
-- it definitely sounds like you need to be much much much more selective when choosing your partners.
I admittedly haven't read through every single post on this thread, so hopefully I don't repeat stuff that's already been said. Anyway, here's my two cents worth...I tend to prefer uncut over cut, but I'm not turning away either. I'm uncut myself, so foreskin is not foreign to me. One issue that annoys me is that I hear people saying that uncut is nasty and unclean, like that's just part of the territory. There are all different types of uncut. There are those with long foreskin overhang. Those with short foreskins where the head peeks out, and those whose foreskin is short enough that you can't really tell the cock is uncut at first. There are people like me who precum a lot and they stay nice and lubed under the foreskin, and those who are dry under their forskin. But precum is not cock cheese. I understand that some people are cut and have only ever been with a cut man, and so the whole moist under the foreskin thing throws them. Whatever floats your boat. And yes, people with foreskin probably have to be more diligent about smells, just like women have to be more diligent about smells down there. But regular showers and a little soap takes care of all that. It's only nasty people who never clean themselves who develop smegma and have that horrible odor. Smegma is clear indicator that the person has not pulled back their foreskin and washed for a good while, and I would be hesitant to put my mouth on any body part of someone whose hygiene habits were that bad, especially knowing that they're getting ready to have sex.
My partner and I are both intact with foreskins. We both highly prefer a man whose penis has been left alone as nature intended it, who has a foreskin full of wonderful nerve endings and a more sensitive penis that cut men won't ever have, and who has not had his genitals mutilated without his consent like cut men have. Also when you jerk off with another man that's not cut there's no need to use those nasty gunky lubes that cut men love to use which cut dudes without a foreskin claim feel good but really do not at all.
In both our experiences, men who are cut do not last nearly as long as men who have foreskin do, and the penis becomes disfigured and mutilated when it's circumcised which its owner had no consent over having done to his body.
Male, much prefer cut, especially with a nice helmet, I'm cut.
It is encouraging to know, within the next 40 years, perhaps sooner.
People will look back in time and ask:
How could parents have thrown their firstborn into the fire for the sake of tradition?
How could the Nazis have performed all their horrid things they did?
How could parents have circumcised their little boy?
How could parents have circumcised their little girl?
Clearly, there must have been some quantum DNA leap between the loving, caring, feeling, people of today and the barbarian/sociopath parents/people of the past who self righteously harmed others and did these things.
In best hope for the future...
Blue
I'm female, and my personal preference is for the sensitivity of a clean, uncut cock. But I figure a man's cock is like his hair ... if he's happy, then I'm pretty sure I'm going to be happy, too. :)
Most cultures worldwide and throughout history have not mutilated the genitals of their boys. Even in the United States the practice is rapidly going away. Within a generation or two men who are cut will be in the minority like they are worldwide and in Europe and the UK.
1. male
2. I prefer cut......yummy ;)
Male , cut and prefer little little or no pubes
Male with foreskin here. I prefer an intact penis but do not exclude guys that have been cut.
Male, cut, no preference either way. Have had a lot of fun with both!!!
Funny thing is I am having to fight with my own family on this topic. I just had a son. I am not getting him cut. I won't pierce my girls ears unless they want it and I won't cut my son unless he decides. Shouldn't have to fight as bad as I am so far. Wife didn't care either way. I am cut. Wish I wasn't but I don't think I have had bad effects from being cut. A person just needs to know how to clean it as well as the parents/daycare knowing how to clean it.